Conservation of Angular Momentum

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on a physics problem involving the conservation of angular momentum for a spinning merry-go-round with two children. The initial setup involves calculating the new rotation rate after a second child jumps on. The equation I1ω1=I2ω2 is correctly applied, but initial angular velocity must be converted from revolutions per second to radians per second for accurate calculations. After addressing the setup and ensuring all variables are included, the calculated new rotation rate is confirmed to be 0.214 rev/s. The importance of unit conversion and thorough variable inclusion is emphasized in solving such problems.
icf927
Messages
12
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A solid cylinder merry-go-round of mass 250kg and radius of 1.9m spinning at 1 revolution every 5 seconds has a 40kg child sitting at 1.1m from the axis. A 50kg child, running tangentially at 3m/s, jumps on the merry go round at the outer edge. What is the new rotation rate in rev/s?


Homework Equations


I1ω1=I2ω2


The Attempt at a Solution


(1/2MR^2 +m1r^2)ω1 + (m2r^2)(v/r)=(1/2MR^2 +m1r^2 +m2r^2)ω2
I plugged in all the variables and solved for ω2 and got 0.214 rev/s. Did I set up the equation correctly and come about the right answer?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The radii are different for the children.

ehild
 
yes I plugged in the different radii. I just forgot to put a 1 and 2 behind them in the equations.
 
Could you please show your calculations in detail?

ehild
 
(1/2(250kg)(1.9m)^2)(1.256637061rad/s)+((50kg)(1.9m)^2(3m/s/1.9m)=(1/2(250kg)(1.9m)^2+(40kg)(1.1m)^2+(50kg)(1.9m)^2)w2.

solved for angular velocity(w2) and got 0.214rev/s. is this the right set up?
 
icf927 said:
(1/2(250kg)(1.9m)^2)(1.256637061rad/s)+((50kg)(1.9m)^2(3m/s/1.9m)=(1/2(250kg)(1.9m)^2+(40kg)(1.1m)^2+(50kg)(1.9m)^2)w2.

solved for angular velocity(w2) and got 0.214rev/s. is this the right set up?

You left out the first child on the left hand side.

ehild
 
I did it on paper just forgot to type it on here. When I include the first child on the left hand side, is that the right setup?
 
It is, but I got different result. Show calculations in detail.

ehild
 
Did you change the initial angular velocity from revolution/sec to rad/sec and then change the final answer back to revolutions/sec
 
  • #10
Ops! You are right. I calculated w. So your result is correct.

ehild
 
Back
Top