Conservation of energy and maximum height

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on using conservation of energy to determine the maximum height an object can reach when projected vertically. The maximum height is defined as h_max = (1/2)(v^2)/g, where v is the initial speed and g is the acceleration due to gravity. A user attempts to calculate the height at which the projectile has a speed of 0.5v, initially finding h = (0.125(v^2))/g, but realizes this is incorrect. Clarifications are sought regarding the definitions of v and the calculations involved, particularly how to relate kinetic energy at 0.5v to potential energy and height. The conversation emphasizes the importance of correctly applying energy conservation principles to solve for height in terms of maximum height.
senseandsanity
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
Using conservation of energy, I found the maximum height v to which an object will rise is h_max= ((1/2)*(v^2))/(g).
At what height h above the ground does the projectile have a speed of 0.5v?
I found h= (0.125*(v^2))/(g) but that isn't correct.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think you did it right, but made a small algebraic blunder. Check over your work clearly.
 
I'm still not getting the right answer and I need it for another question. Any other help would be great.
 
Can you enlighten us a little on the details of the problem? What exactly does v represent in these equations? How do you get them?
 
senseandsanity said:
Using conservation of energy, I found the maximum height v to which an object will rise is h_max= ((1/2)*(v^2))/(g).
I assume you mean that you found the maxiumum height for an object projected straight up at initial speed v. If so, good.
At what height h above the ground does the projectile have a speed of 0.5v?
I found h= (0.125*(v^2))/(g) but that isn't correct.
What fraction of the original KE does the object have when its speed is 0.5v? So how much of its final PE does it have? Use that to figure the height in terms of h_max.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top