Conservation of energy at terminal velocity

AI Thread Summary
When a spherical object reaches terminal velocity, gravitational potential energy (Ug) is converted primarily into heat due to air resistance and drag. At terminal velocity, kinetic energy (Ke) remains constant while Ug decreases, leading to energy transformation rather than loss. In a vacuum, there is no terminal velocity since there is no drag, meaning Ug continues to convert into kinetic energy without any balance. The discussion highlights the importance of understanding energy conservation and the role of work in these processes. Ultimately, the conversion of Ug at terminal velocity is primarily to heat, while in a vacuum, Ug continuously transforms into kinetic energy.
Jake 7174
Messages
80
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement



A spherical object is dropped from an elevation great enough such that it will achieve terminal velocity for some period of time before hitting the ground. Once terminal velocity is achieved what is gravitational potential energy converted to.

Homework Equations


Ug = mgh
Ke = mv^2 / 2

The Attempt at a Solution


First off let me say this was not asked as homework. It is a question that occurred to me randomly and made me Realize I am missing some understanding.

Ug is dependent on height which will change until the object is at rest and Ke is dependent on velocity which will continue to change until acceleration is 0 (terminal velocity in this situation). Once terminal velocity is reached Ke is constant but Ug is changing. Ug must be converted to some other form of energy. The only thing i can think of is heat due to the friction of drag but then i ask myself what would happen if the sphere was in a vacuum? Here drag is zero. There must be some other form of energy that we didn't cover. What is it, or am i totally screwed up from the beginning?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you are in a vacuum, There is no terminal velocity.

Terminal velocity is achieved when air resistance balance out gravity perfectly. So as usual if PE changes to KE but KE doesn't change then where did the energy go?

Look at this equation and tell me what do you see
PE1 + KE + W = PE2 + KE
KE is constant doesn't change. But look at W. What does it do? What does it represent?

Work is either giving energy to the system or taking away. Also there is conservative forces which only change the form of energy but doesn't add or take away energy but that is not our point. Try to conclude something out of that equation.

So basically as you mentioned above it is friction and heat
 
Jake 7174 said:

Homework Statement



A spherical object is dropped from an elevation great enough such that it will achieve terminal velocity for some period of time before hitting the ground. Once terminal velocity is achieved what is gravitational potential energy converted to.

Homework Equations


Ug = mgh
Ke = mv^2 / 2

The Attempt at a Solution


First off let me say this was not asked as homework. It is a question that occurred to me randomly and made me Realize I am missing some understanding.

Ug is dependent on height which will change until the object is at rest and Ke is dependent on velocity which will continue to change until acceleration is 0 (terminal velocity in this situation). Once terminal velocity is reached Ke is constant but Ug is changing. Ug must be converted to some other form of energy. The only thing i can think of is heat due to the friction of drag but then i ask myself what would happen if the sphere was in a vacuum? Here drag is zero. There must be some other form of energy that we didn't cover. What is it, or am i totally screwed up from the beginning?
You are correct (about heat and friction). There is no contradiction in case of a vacuum because then there is no such thing as a terminal velocity, the speed keeps increasing following ##\Delta U_g + \Delta K =0 ## (well, the speed keeps increasing following this equation until relativistic effects become non negligible :-) )
 
nrqed said:
You are correct (about heat and friction). There is no contradiction in case of a vacuum because then there is no such thing as a terminal velocity, the speed keeps increasing following ##\Delta U_g + \Delta K =0 ## (well, the speed keeps increasing following this equation until relativistic effects become non negligible :-) )
Ahh.. of course. Terminal velocity doesn't exist because there is nothing to cancel Ug. Thank you.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top