Conservation of energy in a CM system moving at constant velocity

AI Thread Summary
The discussion addresses the application of conservation of energy in a center of mass (CM) system moving at constant velocity, specifically questioning the validity of using kinetic energy equations across different reference frames. It highlights that while kinetic energy (KE) varies depending on the observer's frame, the principle of energy conservation remains valid across all frames. The equation presented demonstrates that angles of deflection in collisions are consistent in the CM frame, despite differing KE values. The distinction between frame invariance and conservation is emphasized, clarifying that energy conservation is a universal principle. Overall, the method is valid as long as the conservation laws are applied correctly within the appropriate frame.
Leo Liu
Messages
353
Reaction score
156
My book uses ##1/2m_1v_{1c}^2+1/2m_2v_{2c}^2=1/2m_1v_{1c}'^2+1/2m_2v_{2c}'^2## to show that the angles of deflection of the collision between two particles are the same in the centre of mass frame. However, I am doubtful that one can apply the conservation of energy to a "moving" system because the kinetic energies of the same object measured at different observers are different. Is this method valid?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
In what situation? I don't see anything wrong with that except for the lack of parentheses where they belong.
 
Leo Liu said:
I am doubtful that one can apply the conservation of energy to a "moving" system because the kinetic energies of the same object measured at different observers are different. Is this method valid?
Frame invariant and conserved are two completely independent concepts. KE is frame variant, it has different values in different frames. But in all frames energy is conserved, its value stays the same over time.
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71 and Leo Liu
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top