Conservation of Energy in Elastic Collisions: Solving for Initial Velocity

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a physics problem involving the conservation of momentum after an explosion, rather than an elastic collision. Participants debate whether to use kinetic energy or momentum equations to find the initial velocity of a 2 kg object that explodes into two particles. It is clarified that the problem requires solving for momentum in both the x and y directions due to the differing angles of the resulting velocities. The confusion arises from treating the velocities as if they were all aligned in one direction, which is incorrect. Ultimately, the consensus is that the problem should be approached using vector components rather than assuming a single axis.
joejoe333
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hello all,

On our test today the question said, "An 2 Kg object is moving along the x-axis and explodes, with particle 1, 1 Kg, shooting north at 3 m/s, and particle 2, 1 Kg, traveling 30 degrees north of east at 5 m/s. What was the initial velocity of the object?"

Now I was talking with a friend, and we each came up with two answers:
Would you treat it like an elastic collision, and if so, would you use the kinetic energy or momentum equations?

kinetic energy: ((m1v1i)^2)/2 + ((m2v2i)^2)/2 = ((m1v1f)^2)/2 + ((m2v2f)^2)/2

(2)(v1^2)/2 = (4.5) + (12.5)

v1 = 4.12

OR

m1v1i = m1v1f + m2v2f
2vi = 3 + 5
vi = 4

OR

Would you turn the problem into a triangle; since the velocity is 3 m/s going straight north, and 5 m/s 30 degrees north of east, you can turn it into a right triangle, and the missing side would have to be 4 m/s.

This question has been bugging me all day, until I finally decided to find this site, register, and ask you guys! haha. The answer of 4.00 m/s seems more reasonable, but it's weird that when you use the kinetic energy conservation equation that it ends up as 4.12 and not 4.00. Thank you in advance!

-Joe
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There is no collision. It's a momentum conservation problem. Simply use that fact for both the x and y direction.
 
Except that, if the original object was moving on the x-axis, with no northward component of velocity, the two products of the explosion cannot have a net northward component as here.

Your calculation:
m1v1i = m1v1f + m2v2f
2vi = 3 + 5
vi = 4
is incorrect- you are treating this as if all velocities were due east. The velocities are not in the same direction.
 
So is 4.11 a wrong answer, as well? Sorry, I'm kind of a n00b, I'm just in 1081 and my professor is straight from China and has an extrememly heavy accent so I have no clue what he says when I talk to him. What you guys are saying, though, is that I would have to solve the both the y and x directions of momentum?
 
joejoe333 said:
So is 4.11 a wrong answer, as well? Sorry, I'm kind of a n00b, I'm just in 1081 and my professor is straight from China and has an extrememly heavy accent so I have no clue what he says when I talk to him. What you guys are saying, though, is that I would have to solve the both the y and x directions of momentum?
There was no need to mention an x-axis in the problem. We tend to think of the x-axis pointing East because of the way we draw maps, but in this problem the x-axis could not possibly have been East. The answer is found, as others have said, by finding both components of momentum before and after the explosion, but since the final velocies are given relative to compass points, do the problem in terms of compass points and forget about x and y.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top