B Conservation of energy in quantum physics

IAmJustCurious
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I am still in secondary school so I probably shouldn't think about things this complicated (at least that's what it seems to me, complicated), but please correct me if I'm wrong. If I recall correctly, the position of an electron is never certain, and always based on probability, unless observed. Now let's do a though experiment in an isolated system:

"The electron of a simple Hydrogen atom is located at 0.1 nm from its single proton when observed, but due to my understanding of how physics works. When - after this observation the electron stays unobserved for a tiny moment of time, and - after that it's been observed at 0.5 nm, it should gain potential enegry fivefold. Also, it's angular momentum should increase, as well as the mass of the entire atom due to E=mc²"

I know I'm probably wrong, and it has something to do with the velocity of the electron changing or something like that, but I was wondering what the actual answer would be, and it's fun to think about.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
IAmJustCurious said:
it should gain potential enegry fivefold.
Beside position, the potential energy also has some uncertainty. Thus, saying "it should" will go against the theory.

IAmJustCurious said:
it's angular momentum should increase
Yet another quantity having nonzero uncertainty is the angular momentum.

IAmJustCurious said:
as well as the mass of the entire atom due to E=mc²"
In non-relativistic QM, mass of particles are constant, i.e. it cannot have any other value than what it is already given.
 
  • Like
Likes bhobba
blue_leaf77 said:
Beside position, the potential energy also has some uncertainty. Thus, saying "it should" will go against the theory.Yet another quantity having nonzero uncertainty is the angular momentum.In non-relativistic QM, mass of particles are constant, i.e. it cannot have any other value than what it is already given.
Thanks for pointing out the holes in my theory.
 
IAmJustCurious said:
Thanks for pointing out the holes in my theory.
Just want to let you know, thought experiment is different from a theory. Speaking of the theory of quantum physics, it has been well developed in quantum mechanics and quantum field theory, and these are already mature theories by now.
 
  • Like
Likes bhobba
blue_leaf77 said:
Just want to let you know, thought experiment is different from a theory. Speaking of the theory of quantum physics, it has been well developed in quantum mechanics and quantum field theory, and these are already mature theories by now.
Sorry I should have said something like hypothesis. You're right
 
Hello curious :welcome:

Keep up the curiosity !
 
  • Like
Likes entropy1, bhobba and IAmJustCurious
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
38
Views
6K
Replies
25
Views
3K
Back
Top