B Conservation of energy in quantum physics

IAmJustCurious
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I am still in secondary school so I probably shouldn't think about things this complicated (at least that's what it seems to me, complicated), but please correct me if I'm wrong. If I recall correctly, the position of an electron is never certain, and always based on probability, unless observed. Now let's do a though experiment in an isolated system:

"The electron of a simple Hydrogen atom is located at 0.1 nm from its single proton when observed, but due to my understanding of how physics works. When - after this observation the electron stays unobserved for a tiny moment of time, and - after that it's been observed at 0.5 nm, it should gain potential enegry fivefold. Also, it's angular momentum should increase, as well as the mass of the entire atom due to E=mc²"

I know I'm probably wrong, and it has something to do with the velocity of the electron changing or something like that, but I was wondering what the actual answer would be, and it's fun to think about.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
IAmJustCurious said:
it should gain potential enegry fivefold.
Beside position, the potential energy also has some uncertainty. Thus, saying "it should" will go against the theory.

IAmJustCurious said:
it's angular momentum should increase
Yet another quantity having nonzero uncertainty is the angular momentum.

IAmJustCurious said:
as well as the mass of the entire atom due to E=mc²"
In non-relativistic QM, mass of particles are constant, i.e. it cannot have any other value than what it is already given.
 
  • Like
Likes bhobba
blue_leaf77 said:
Beside position, the potential energy also has some uncertainty. Thus, saying "it should" will go against the theory.Yet another quantity having nonzero uncertainty is the angular momentum.In non-relativistic QM, mass of particles are constant, i.e. it cannot have any other value than what it is already given.
Thanks for pointing out the holes in my theory.
 
IAmJustCurious said:
Thanks for pointing out the holes in my theory.
Just want to let you know, thought experiment is different from a theory. Speaking of the theory of quantum physics, it has been well developed in quantum mechanics and quantum field theory, and these are already mature theories by now.
 
  • Like
Likes bhobba
blue_leaf77 said:
Just want to let you know, thought experiment is different from a theory. Speaking of the theory of quantum physics, it has been well developed in quantum mechanics and quantum field theory, and these are already mature theories by now.
Sorry I should have said something like hypothesis. You're right
 
Hello curious :welcome:

Keep up the curiosity !
 
  • Like
Likes entropy1, bhobba and IAmJustCurious
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
38
Views
6K
Replies
25
Views
3K
Back
Top