Conservation of energy, momentum

AI Thread Summary
In a system of three pool balls, where one ball moves at 1 meter per second and collides with two stationary balls, momentum is conserved, but kinetic energy is not necessarily conserved. If the moving ball comes to a stop, the two stationary balls could each move at a speed of 0.5 meters per second, but this results in a loss of kinetic energy due to the nature of elastic and inelastic collisions. It's important to account for all forms of energy, including rotational energy, when considering energy conservation. Momentum conservation is generally more reliable in these scenarios, as energy can be lost to the environment. The discussion also draws parallels to electrical systems, emphasizing the complexities of energy transfer and conservation.
ripoli85
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
i don´t quite understand:

if you have a system made up of three pool balls. one of them is moving with a speed of 1 meters per second, the two other balls are standing still. if the moving ball hits the two other balls, in a way that the moving ball is standing still afterwards, then the two other balls should have a speed of 0.5 meters per second each, so that momentum is conserved in this system, right?
if that is the case than there is a loss of kinetic energy, because 1 ball moving at a certain speed has double the kinetic energy, than two balls moving at half the speed?
but energy is supposed to be conserved in a system two.
can someone please help get rid of that twist in my head, what am i getting wrong here? is momentum not being conserved in a system?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes momentum is conserved. And yes there is a loss of kinetic energy to the environment.

However a rolling ball also has rotational energy so you need to add all types of energy to do an energy balance.

You always have to be careful accounting for all the energy changes when using conservation of energy conservation of momentum can be a safer bet (although less intuitive) this is will come home if you ever study elementary particle physics.

There is an equivalent situation in electricity.

Consider two identical capacitors, one charged, one not charged.

Now connect the discharged one across the charged one.

What is the voltage across the combination and what is the energy state of the system?
 
ripoli85 said:
i don´t quite understand:

if you have a system made up of three pool balls. one of them is moving with a speed of 1 meters per second, the two other balls are standing still. if the moving ball hits the two other balls, in a way that the moving ball is standing still afterwards, then the two other balls should have a speed of 0.5 meters per second each,

Your conservation of momentum argument is wrong, because the balls can move in different directions, so their speed can be larger, but their momentum can still be equal to momentum of the first ball.
 
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top