Conservation of Energy Problem

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a conservation of energy problem involving two masses, m1 and m2. Key points include the confusion over whether m1 has potential energy when on the tabletop and the need for clarity on initial and final conditions. It is established that m1 does have potential energy based on the chosen reference level, typically the floor. Additionally, the conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding the motion of m1 as it accelerates until m2 reaches the ground. The use of both energy conservation principles and Newton's laws is suggested to solve the problem effectively.
ianmgull
Messages
19
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


P3NaLOL.png



Homework Equations



ΔK1+ΔK2+ΔU1+ΔU2 = 0

The Attempt at a Solution



The biggest stumbling block I have is setting up the initial and final conditions. First the initial:

1)Does m1 have potential energy in this setup? Part of me thinks it would have m1gh but I could also see it having zero potential energy (being on the table top).

2)I assume the final state would be right when m1 hits the ground (m2 has already hit). If this is the case, don't I need information at some intermediate state between the two? For instance, when m1 leaves the table?

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Why don't you try applying Newtons laws and kinematics and then energy principles?
 
Last edited:
I figured I would need to know the distance that m2 is from the edge of the table for that (which I don't know). Is there something I'm missing that you could point out?
 
oh sorry first of all welcome to Physics forum :)
See that the mass m1 will experience force till mass m2 has not reached the ground. So mass m1 will keep on accelerating till mass m2 reaches the ground. So you can calculate how much it will accelerate as you know the distance of m2 from ground.Understood?
 
Last edited:
You can use either conservation of energy or the laws of motion.
I understand that you are expected to use energy laws, right?

The values of potential energy will depend on where do you choose the reference level.
If you use the floor, m1 will have potential energy (m1*g*h) in the initial state. And it will have the same potential energy in the final state (for part a).
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top