Conservation of energy theorem problem

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on a physics problem involving two boxes connected by a rope, where one box's speed needs to be calculated when it is 1.8 meters above the ground. The initial potential energy was incorrectly calculated by not maintaining a consistent reference point for height, leading to an erroneous total energy equation. The correct approach involves using consistent height values for potential energy calculations, ensuring that the change in height is accurately reflected. The distinction between using U = mg delta y and U = mgh is clarified, emphasizing the importance of a defined reference point for potential energy. Ultimately, the solution hinges on correctly applying these principles to arrive at the accurate speed of the first box.
fishingspree2
Messages
138
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


2 boxes are connected by a massless rope. the system is frictionless
m1 = 3kg
m2 = 5kg
http://img388.imageshack.us/img388/2033/problemwr4.jpg
Find m1's speed when it is 1.8 m above the ground.

Homework Equations


K = 0.5mv^2
U = mg delta y

The Attempt at a Solution


v1=v2 obviously
also, delta y of m1 = 1.8, whereas delta y of m2=-1.8
At the beginning:
Etot = K1 + K2 + U1 + U2
since K1, K2 and U1 are = 0, Etot = U2 = m2*g*5 = 25g

When m1 is 1.8 meters above the ground:
Etot = K1+K2+U1+U2
25g = 0.5m1v2+0.5m2v2+1.8m1g-1.8m2g

solving for v gives 8.37,
but the answer is 2.97
can anyone help me find what is wrong in my reasoning?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
m2 ends up not at -1.8m, but at (5-1.8)m.

Otherwise, you did the right thing.
 
Also, be careful about your velocities. Though it doesn't matter in this problem since velocities are squared, it should be:

<br /> v_1 = -v_2 <br />
 
borgwal said:
m2 ends up not at -1.8m, but at (5-1.8)m.

Otherwise, you did the right thing.

I thought that what is important is the difference of height, and not the height itself. since the formula is U = mg delta y.. then delta y = [(5-1.8] - 5] = -1.8
humm can you please tell me where I am mistaken?

EDIT: I also see in the book U=mgh. If I had used this formula I woulnd't have had problems. What is the difference between both? When to use one instead of the other?

thank you
 
You did NOT use the change in height: you wrote down the initial potential energy as mgh_2, with h_2=5m, then in the final potential energy you used h_2=-1.8m. That's inconsistent. Either you use the change in kinetic energy, or you use the correct initial and final potential energies.
 
You have to set an absolute coordinate system and work from there. i.e. the ground is y=0.

The \Delta y is most likely referring to the fact that potential energy is always relative with respect to some reference point. If we set the ground to be y=0 then \Delta y is just y ( \Delta y = y - 0 = y.

On the other hand, if we set sea level to be 0 but then do experiments in a city not at sea level, well \Delta y = y - y_0 where y_0 is the height above sea level, and y is height with respect to sea level. (Though at this point, it would make more sense to set y_0 to be zero, and take y to be height above the ground you're using).

With this in mind, you can see that \Delta y
is almost always just y.
 
Last edited:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top