Conservation of momentum and Moment of Inertia

AI Thread Summary
To incorporate moment of inertia into the conservation of momentum equation, it's essential to understand the relationship between linear and angular momentum. The discussion emphasizes the need to clarify the specific equation being referenced and to recognize that both the ball and bat possess angular momentum. A suggested resource is provided to illustrate how angular momentum applies when a ball strikes a rod. The user expresses a desire for guidance rather than direct solutions, indicating a willingness to learn independently. This approach highlights the importance of foundational knowledge in physics concepts for effective problem-solving.
Pbaseball
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hello everyone,
I'm needing help understanding how to take the conservation of momentum equation and substitute moment of inertia inplace of mass in the equation. I understand this is a linear equation and I'm trying to incorporate angular momentum. I just want to determine the speed of the ball and bat swing using the moi of the baseball bat. Can someone help me get started? Thanks --Roy
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello Roy, :welcome:

You could start off by stating a clear case to begin with. Not clear at all what you are looking at: 'the equation' is mentioned but reader has no idea. Cold you be a bit more elaborate ?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
CWatters said:
Perhaps start by understanding that the ball has angular momentum..

"Ball hits rod angular momentum example"
https://www.khanacademy.org/science...rial/v/ball-hits-rod-angular-momentum-example

Sweet. Thanks for the direction.
If you read in my introduction thread I'm ready to learn and teach myself but I just need some direction. I'm not looking for you guys/gals to do this for me. Thanks again. Any help is appreciated.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top