Conservation of momentum/energy

  • Thread starter Thread starter dougy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Conservation
AI Thread Summary
In a perfectly isolated system, both momentum and energy are conserved, but it is possible for a system to gain or lose energy while maintaining the same momentum. This can occur in a hypothetical non-isolated system where energy is added without affecting momentum. The relationship between kinetic and potential energy is explored, highlighting that changes in potential energy can occur without corresponding changes in kinetic energy. An example provided illustrates this concept, where an object can be lifted to increase potential energy while its velocity remains unchanged. Overall, the discussion emphasizes the independence of kinetic and potential energy in certain scenarios.
dougy
Messages
26
Reaction score
0
Hello,

Inside a theoretical perfectly isolated system, momentum and energy are conserved. But is it possible to imagine a system gaining/losing energy while its momentum remains the same, or a system gaining/losing momentum while its energy remains the same? Or does one necessarily imply the other?

The way I see it, if the system consists of one macroscopic body, then its momentum is equal to the vectorial sum of the momentums of all its atoms. So if this body was to gain energy in the form of heat, then its atoms would vibrate more rigorously, thus if on average all these atoms "pushed" equally more in all directions then wouldn't this body be an example of a system gaining energy while keeping the same momentum?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
dougy said:
So if this body was to gain energy in the form of heat
Then this body alone does not constitute an isolated system. You would have to include the heat source in the system for it to be considered isolated.

dougy said:
But is it possible to imagine a system gaining/losing energy while its momentum remains the same, or a system gaining/losing momentum while its energy remains the same?
Why not? The total energy of a system in general is the sum of its potential and kinetic energies. The momentum of the system is related only to the kinetic energy of the system via p = \sqrt{2mK}, and is independent of the potential energy.
 
Last edited:
Fightfish said:
Then this body alone does not constitute an isolated system. You would have to include the heat source in the system for it to be considered isolated.

Yes of course, I was there referring to a hypothetical non-isolated system gaining energy and not momentum.

Fightfish said:
Why not? The total energy of a system in general is the sum of its potential and kinetic energies. The momentum of the system is related only to the kinetic energy of the system via p = \sqrt{2mK}, and is independent of the potential energy.

Is it obvious that kinetic and potential energies are independent? Do you have an example where the variation of the potential energy of a system is not accompanied with a variation of its kinetic energy?
 
dougy said:
Do you have an example where the variation of the potential energy of a system is not accompanied with a variation of its kinetic energy?
Sure, consider any object present in a potential field. As long as I apply a force on the object such that the net force on the object is zero, I can change its position (and hence its potential energy) without changing the velocity of the object.
 
Fightfish said:
Sure, consider any object present in a potential field. As long as I apply a force on the object such that the net force on the object is zero, I can change its position (and hence its potential energy) without changing the velocity of the object.

All good, thank you!
 
Fightfish said:
Sure, consider any object present in a potential field. As long as I apply a force on the object such that the net force on the object is zero, I can change its position (and hence its potential energy) without changing the velocity of the object.
To give a real world example just consider picking up something of mass m form the ground and holding it over your head. Since the potential energy is mgh and the object went from standing still to standing still again it has just gained mg times your height in potential energy.
 
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top