Conservation of Momentum; finding the angular speed of a Neutron star

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the angular speed of a neutron star using the conservation of momentum. The initial radius of the star is 6.0×10^5 km, and after collapse, it becomes 16 km. The original star's rotation period is 33 days, which was incorrectly converted to angular velocity. Participants emphasize the importance of using the correct number of significant figures and the proper conversion of angular velocity for accurate calculations. Ultimately, the correct angular speed of the neutron star is determined to be approximately 3098.95 rad/s.
Northbysouth
Messages
241
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


Under some circumstances, a star can collapse into an extremely dense object made mostly of neutrons and called a neutron star. The density of a neutron star is roughly 10^{14} times as great as that of ordinary solid matter. Suppose we represent the star as a uniform, solid, rigid sphere, both before and after the collapse. The star's initial radius was 6.0×10^5km (comparable to our sun); its final radius is 16km

If the original star rotated once in 33 days, find the angular speed of the neutron star.
Express your answer using two significant figures and in rad/s

Ri = initial radius
Rf = final radius

Homework Equations


Conservation of Momentum

I = 2/5MR^2

L = Iw

The Attempt at a Solution



I first converted the 1 rev/ 33 days to rad/s

1/33 rev/ day *(2pi)*(1 day/24 hours)*(1hour/60 min)*(1 min/60 sec)
w = 0.000002 rad/s

I = (2/5)*(M)*(Ri^2)*(0.000002) = (2/5)*(M)*(Rf^2)wf

The masses (M) and the 2/5 cancel

3.6x1017 = 2.56x108*wf

wf = 1.40625x109

It says it's wrong. The only thing that I can think of that is wrong is that I did the angular velocity (w) conversion wrong.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Northbysouth said:
I first converted the 1 rev/ 33 days to rad/s

1/33 rev/ day *(2pi)*(1 day/24 hours)*(1hour/60 min)*(1 min/60 sec)
w = 0.000002 rad/s

Hello,
Note that you've only kept 1 significant figure in w. How many sig figs should you have? Also, you might want to use scientific notation for this very small number.

I = (2/5)*(M)*(Ri^2)*(0.000002) = (2/5)*(M)*(Rf^2)wf

I'm sure you meant to type L rather than I at the beginning of the equation.

The masses (M) and the 2/5 cancel

3.6x1017 = 2.56x108*wf

Did you forget to multiply by wi on the left side?
 
I think you're right. So I get:
(6x10^8)^2 * 0.000002 = (16000)^2 * wf

wf = 2812.5 rad/s

But my answer is still wrong
 
Look's like your method is correct. But I really do think you should include more significant figures in your expression for wi. The number .000002 has only one significant figure. The problem gives data with two significant figures. What do you get for wi expressed to two significant figures? How does this affect your final answer?
 
You are correct. I ran the calculation again using the exact value my calculator gave me. wf = 3098.95.

My calculator is a TI-89 and I was used the approximate function to get the answer, which gave me 0.000002. The real value for wi is pi/1425600.
Thank you for your help.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top