Conservation of Momentum in a Spaceship Explosion

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on solving a conservation of momentum problem involving a spaceship explosion. Initially, the user attempted to use kinetic energy calculations, which led to an incorrect velocity for the third section. After realizing the need to apply momentum conservation principles, they correctly accounted for vector directions and arithmetic errors. The final calculation yielded a velocity of approximately 1.46 x 10^7 m/s for the third section, aligning with the book's solution. The key takeaway emphasizes the importance of treating momentum as a vector quantity and ensuring accurate arithmetic in calculations.
Beers Law
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi all,

I have become frusturated at a conservation of momentum problem. A space ship(ss) with a mass of 2.0*10^6 [kg] is crusing at a speed of 5.0*10^6 [m/s], when it blows up. One section(s1), with mass 5.0*10^5 [kg] is blown straight backwards at a speed of 2.0*10^6 [m/s]. The second section(s2), with mass 8.0*10^5 [kg], continues forwards at a speed of 1.0*10^6 [m/s]. A third section moves at a certain speed.

Trying to find the speed of the third section, I initally approached the problem as a kinetic energy problem, considering that I might be able to use KE=(1/2)mv^2 and simply subtract s1+s2 from ss because the explosion is internal and the change in kinetic energy will be 0:

First, the third section has a mass of 7.0*10^5[kg]

KE(ss)=2.5*10^19 [J]
KE(s1)= 1.0*10^18 [J]
KE(s2)= 4.0*10^17 [J]

KE(s1+s2)= 1.4*10^18[J]

So I subtracted this from KE(ss):

2.5*10^19 [J]-1.4*10^18[J]= 2.36*10^19 [J], which is the KE for the third section

Then I set up 2.36*10^19 [J] = (1/2)*(7.0*10^5)(v_s3)^2, and I obtained a velocity for the third section of v_s3= 7.93*10^6 [m/s]! The solution in the back of the book reads 1.46*10^7 [m/s].

So, ok, this is obviously not the correct way to set up this problem, so I did vector sum for momentum using p(vector)=m*v(vector).

The spaceship has a vector 9.45*10^12 [kg*m/s]
Section1 has vector 1.144*10^12 [kg*m/s]
Section2 has vector 1.105*10^12 [kg*m/s]

Section 3 has mass of 7.5*10^5 [kg]. I subtracted section1+section2 vectors from the spaceship vector, and the result was 7.201*10^12 [kg*m/s]. Then I inserted this back into the p(vector)=m*v(vector):

7.201*10^12 [kg*m/s]= 7.5*10^5[kg] * v

I solved for v and received 9.6*10^6[m/s].

Im obviously not doing something right. I think I may not be factoring in that these are vectors? Thanks for any help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Beers Law said:
Trying to find the speed of the third section, I initally approached the problem as a kinetic energy problem, considering that I might be able to use KE=(1/2)mv^2 and simply subtract s1+s2 from ss because the explosion is internal and the change in kinetic energy will be 0:
Forget about KE. It's not conserved in an explosion.

First, the third section has a mass of 7.0*10^5[kg]
Right.

...

So, ok, this is obviously not the correct way to set up this problem, so I did vector sum for momentum using p(vector)=m*v(vector).
Right, but realize that vectors have direction. (Or at least a sign.)

The spaceship has a vector 9.45*10^12 [kg*m/s]
Why 9.45? 2.0 x 5.0 = 10. And in what direction? Call it the positive x-direction.
Section1 has vector 1.144*10^12 [kg*m/s]
Section2 has vector 1.105*10^12 [kg*m/s]
Again, check your arithmetic. Section 1 moves backwards: that's the negative x-direction; Section 2 moves forward: the positive x-direction.

Section 3 has mass of 7.5*10^5 [kg].
Yet another arithmetic error!
I subtracted section1+section2 vectors from the spaceship vector, and the result was 7.201*10^12 [kg*m/s].
Careful! Signs matter.
Im obviously not doing something right. I think I may not be factoring in that these are vectors? Thanks for any help.
Two main mistakes: (1) arithmetic errors (2) not properly treating the sign (which represents the direction, in this case) of the vectors.
 
Thanks for the help. Here is what I have done.

The Ship has a vector of +1.0*10^13.
Section 1 has a vector of -1.0*10^12.
Section 2 has a vector of +8.0*10^11
So, section 3 has a vector of 1.02*10^13, which I set up this way:

1.02*10^13= 700000*v, which returns 1.457*10^7, which is most excellent.

My mistakes are fairly embarassing, but not keeping things organized and thinking too far ahead are my achilles heel with physics.

Thanks again.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top