Conservation of momentum in an inelastic collision

AI Thread Summary
The law of conservation of momentum states that total momentum is conserved in a collision, but individual momenta can change due to exerted forces. Momentum, defined as p = mv, indicates that while mass remains constant, velocity can be significantly lost during inelastic collisions, such as a trolley hitting a brick wall. In this scenario, the trolley loses momentum while the wall gains an imperceptible amount due to its massive size. Impulse, defined as the change in momentum, highlights that momentum is not conserved when external forces are present. Therefore, while total momentum is conserved overall, individual momentum can change due to these forces.
sugaJ
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
The law of conservation of momentum states that all momentum is conserved in a collision. Momentum is defined as p = mv. When a collision occurs, most of the time a lot of velocity is lost and most of the mass remains. For example, a fast moving trolley runs into a brick wall, after hitting the brick wall no mass is lost or gained but a significant amount of velocity is lost. Using the formula p = mv, the final momentum will be lower than the initial momentum.

Also, impulse can be defined as the change in momentum. But isn't momentum always conserved?

This seems to be an obvious paradox but I know that I've got something wrong so can someone please lead me in the write direction. Cheers
 
Physics news on Phys.org
sugaJ said:
The law of conservation of momentum states that all momentum is conserved in a collision.
The total momentum is conserved in a collision. The individual momenta of the various bodies will certainly change--forces are being exerted on them.

Momentum is conserved in the absence of external forces.
Momentum is defined as p = mv. When a collision occurs, most of the time a lot of velocity is lost and most of the mass remains. For example, a fast moving trolley runs into a brick wall, after hitting the brick wall no mass is lost or gained but a significant amount of velocity is lost. Using the formula p = mv, the final momentum will be lower than the initial momentum.

Also, impulse can be defined as the change in momentum. But isn't momentum always conserved?
No. If something experiences a force--thus an impulse--its momentum will change.

When the trolley runs into the wall, the wall and trolley exert forces on each other. The trolley loses momentum and the wall (and the attached earth) gains momentum. (You won't notice the change in the wall's momentum since the wall+earth is so massive.)
 
yep makes sense thanks mate
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top