Conservation of Momentum in Elastic Collisions: Calculating Final Velocity

  • Thread starter Thread starter droomagon
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Frictionless
AI Thread Summary
In an elastic collision between two discs on a frictionless table, disc 1 (100g) moving at 1m/s collides head-on with disc 2 (200g) at rest. The final velocity of both discs after the collision is 0.5 m/s, based on the conservation of momentum and energy principles. The momentum from disc 1 is transferred to disc 2, resulting in both discs moving together at the same velocity post-collision. This scenario highlights the application of fundamental physics principles in predicting outcomes in collisions. Understanding these concepts is crucial for analyzing similar physical situations.
droomagon
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
This is the question that i have on my paper...

Two discs (both circular shape) on a frictionless table, disc 1 with mass 100g moves with velocity 1m/s and collides "head on" elastically without any energy loss with disc 2 with mass 200g and motionless; what will be the final velocity after collision?

Thanks in advance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Use "conservation of momentum" and "conservation of energy". What have YOU done on htis?
 


After the collision, both discs will have the same final velocity of 0.5 m/s. This is because of the principle of conservation of momentum, which states that the total momentum of a system remains constant unless acted upon by an external force. In this case, the momentum of the first disc (100g*1m/s) will be transferred to the second disc, resulting in a final momentum of 100g*0.5m/s. This means that the second disc will have a velocity of 0.5 m/s in the same direction as the first disc's initial velocity. Since the collision is elastic, there is no energy loss, and the discs will continue to move with the same velocity after the collision. This scenario demonstrates the importance of understanding the principles of physics, such as conservation of momentum, in predicting the outcome of a physical situation. I hope this helps!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top