Conservation of Momentum of Rocket Exploding after Takeoff

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the conservation of momentum in the context of a rocket explosion after takeoff. Participants are analyzing the velocities and distances involved in the scenario, as well as the implications of mass ratios on the problem.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss calculations for final velocities and distances before and after the explosion, questioning the coincidence of numerical values. There is an exploration of the relevance of mass ratios and the implications for speed and direction of the rocket's components post-explosion.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants sharing their calculations and expressing uncertainty about their results. Some guidance has been provided regarding the irrelevance of actual masses in certain contexts, and there is a focus on the direction of motion for the heavier portion of the rocket.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the constraints of a homework problem, which may limit the information available for their calculations. The discussion includes assumptions about the time of flight and the ratios of masses involved.

hisiks
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
A 1500 kg weather rocket accelerates upward at 10.0 m/s^2. It explodes 2.00 s after liftoff and
breaks into fragments. One piece is twice as massive as the other. Photos reveal that the
lighter fragment travelled straight up and reached a maximum height of 530 m. What was the
speed and direction of the heavier fragment just after the explosion?
Relevant Equations
pi = pf
m1v1i + m2v1i = m1v2f + m2v2f
vf = vi +at
d = vit + 1/2at^2
vf^2 = vi2 + 2ad
PEi + KEi = PEf + KEf
-Solved for vf using equation 3 to get 20.0m/s (speed before explosion) then solved for the distance to reach the explosion using equation 4, to get 20.0m, which felt wrong having the same numbers but that may just be coincidence.
-Found the distance travelled of the lighter piece using 530m - 20.0m to get 510m travelled after the explosion.
-Stuck trying to use equation 6 to find inital velocity.
Stuck with the remainder of the question.

EDIT: Found masses using Mtotal = m1 + m2, & m2 = 2m1, thefore m1 = 500kg and m2 = 1000kg.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
hisiks said:
that may just be coincidence
It's because the time is 2 seconds and ##\frac 122^2=2##.
hisiks said:
Found masses
The actual masses are irrelevant, unless another part of the question asked for them. The given ratio is all you need.
What did you get for the speed and direction of the heavier portion?
 
haruspex said:
It's because the time is 2 seconds and ##\frac 122^2=2##.

The actual masses are irrelevant, unless another part of the question asked for them. The given ratio is all you need.
What did you get for the speed and direction of the heavier portion?
This is what I came up with for a speed, however I'm not particularly confident in it. As for the direction, would it just be down?
 

Attachments

  • image.jpg
    image.jpg
    37.8 KB · Views: 156
hisiks said:
This is what I came up with for a speed, however I'm not particularly confident in it. As for the direction, would it just be down?
Looks right.
 
haruspex said:
Looks right.
Would you agree the direction would just be down as well?
 
hisiks said:
Would you agree the direction would just be down as well?
yes
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
929
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K