Conservation Of Momentum question

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the Conservation of Momentum principle, specifically in the context of a lorry colliding with a solid concrete wall. In the scenario presented, the lorry has an initial momentum that is reduced upon impact, while the wall, despite remaining stationary, breaks into pieces that gain momentum. It is clarified that the sum of the momentum of the wall pieces will equal the momentum lost by the lorry, adhering to the conservation principle since there are no external forces acting on the system. However, the collision is classified as inelastic, meaning that kinetic energy is not conserved, as some energy is used to break the wall. Overall, the key takeaway is that momentum is conserved in this scenario, but kinetic energy is not.
Fladam
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
We've been discussing the principle of Conservation of Momentum lately in class and I've been wondering, the principle states that for two bodies:
m1u1+m2u2= m1v1+m2v2

I understand that there are some rules which surround this principle but we haven't been shown them in full and I was thinking in class and came up with the following scenario, so I was wondering what rules would come into play in the following events...

Say a lorry travels at a speed of u=20ms-1
and has m=2000kg, so p= 40000 kgms-1

Now if there is a wall made from solid concrete which has u=0ms-1 but a mass of perhaps 500kg, then it has zero momentum of course (p=0kgms-1)

My question is, if the scenario arises where the lorry crashes through the wall, the lorry loses some energy from the collision and it has its velocity ( and hence its momentum) reduced.

The wall also breaks into pieces but it gains energy from the collision, now the wall as a whole remains at zero velocity as it is cemented to the ground, however the pieces which fly off all gain momentum. All of the pieces will have variable masses and velocities and so their momentums will be different, would the sum of the momentum of the pieces add up to allow for the change in momentum for the lorry? Or are there some rules which govern the principle of conservation of momentum that this scenario doesn't obey?

Thanks very much for all your answers, this is my first post on here and I look forward to many more :) I apologize if the answer is a blatant break of the rules of the principle also!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, the pieces flying off carry away the momentum that the lorry lost. Momentum will be conserved in this example since there are no external forces in the direction that the lorry travels in.

However, this is an inelastic collision and therefore you will find that the kinetic energy of the lorry and the flying bits of wall are less than the kinetic energy of the lorry before it crashed. Some energy is spent in breaking the wall.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top