B Conservative and Non Conservative Forces

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the distinction between conservative and non-conservative forces, particularly in the context of applied force and friction. When a force is applied to move an object, the energy conversion depends on the type of force and the work done, with friction converting mechanical energy into heat. The applied force itself is not inherently conservative or dissipative; it depends on its purpose, such as lifting an object which converts energy into gravitational potential energy. Additionally, even when performing negative work, like lowering an object, energy expenditure occurs, highlighting the complexity of energy dynamics in physical tasks. Understanding these concepts is crucial for analyzing energy transfer in mechanical systems.
Physicslearner500039
Messages
124
Reaction score
6
I was referring to the conservative and non conservative forces. When i was thinking about it for example when i apply force on an object on the table the object moves a distance and when i remove the force the object does not come back to original position. Can i assume that the force i apply is non conservative?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi,

It's more the force you have to overcome: the friction force between the moving object and the table is the one that converts the mechanical energy to a lower grade energy (utlimately: heat).

The force you apply is neither conservative or dissipative: depends on what it is used for. For example: when placing a book on a higher shelf, the work you do is converted into gravitational potential energy.

If this brings up the question: what about placing the book on a lower shelf ? There gravity does the positive work and you do the negative work. But you still get tired. Even when just holding the book in front of you, you get tired -- and no (mechanical) work is done at all ! Tell that to your muscles !
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...

Similar threads

Back
Top