Conserved Noether charge and gravity

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
4 replies · 3K views
Messages
3,084
Reaction score
1,608
If one considers the Lagrangian of a non-relativistic particle in a gravitational field,

[tex] L = \frac{m}{2}(\delta_{ij}\dot{x}^i \dot{x}^j + 2 \phi(x^k) )[/tex]

it transforms under

[tex] \delta x^i = \xi^i (t), \ \ \ \ \delta \phi = \ddot{\xi}^i x_i[/tex]

as a total derivative:

[tex] \delta L = \frac{d}{dt}(m \dot{\xi}^i x_i)[/tex]

My question is: why is the corresponding Noether charge

[tex] Q = p_i \xi^i - m \dot{\xi}^i x_i[/tex]

not conserved if one uses the equations of motion? I'm staring at the problem now for quite some time, missing something obvious, but I can't see it :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's confusing, because the EOM for phi is the Poisson equation, which is not dynamical; it could be obtained by adding

[tex] \lambda[\partial_i \partial^i \phi - 4 \pi G \rho][/tex]

to the Lagrangian, where lambda is a Lagrange multiplier. But this doesn't change the situation.
 
So I more or less have the answer to my question; the variation [itex]\delta L[/itex] also contains a

[tex] \frac{\partial L}{\partial \phi}\delta \phi = m \ddot{\xi}^i x_i[/tex]

term, which I don't want. So how to get the corresponding Noether charges?