Constance of speed of light and refraction index question

Taturana
Messages
108
Reaction score
0
I'm new to the forum, so, hi =D

Special theory of relativity tell us that the speed of light is the same, independently of the reference frame.

But we know that, while light travels through some materials (with refraction index larger than one), it speeds slows down.

These two "things" seems to have a contradiction to me. What's the explanation for that? (I think I'm making some confusion with these concepts)

If someone can help me with that, I would be grateful.

Thanks all
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The speed of light in vacuum is the same no matter what the frame of reference. That does not say that the speed is not reduced when it is moving through something.

(You can argue that, since all substances consist of a few atoms with vacuum between them, the speed of light is "c" between the atoms but it is "globally" slower than c because of the time required for the atoms to absorb and re-emit the light.)
 
HallsofIvy said:
The speed of light in vacuum is the same no matter what the frame of reference.

Is that also true assuming light not in vacuum (and the reference frames in the same material too)?
 
Taturana said:
I'm new to the forum, so, hi =D

Special theory of relativity tell us that the speed of light is the same, independently of the reference frame.

But we know that, while light travels through some materials (with refraction index larger than one), it speeds slows down.

These two "things" seems to have a contradiction to me. What's the explanation for that? (I think I'm making some confusion with these concepts)

If someone can help me with that, I would be grateful.

Thanks all

Please start by reading the FAQ thread in the General Physics forum.

Zz.
 
Taturana said:
Is that also true assuming light not in vacuum (and the reference frames in the same material too)?

No!
 
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. The Relativator was sold by (as printed) Atomic Laboratories, Inc. 3086 Claremont Ave, Berkeley 5, California , which seems to be a division of Cenco Instruments (Central Scientific Company)... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/relativator-circular-slide-rule-simulated-with-desmos/ by @robphy

Similar threads

Back
Top