(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({}); In the previous section he derived the components, with respect to the coordinate bases associated with a polar coordinate system, of the Riemannian metric tensor field on S Later, we shall see that constancy of the metric components is sufficient for a space to be flat, and in fact there always exists a coordinate system on any flat space in which the metric is constant (Carroll: Lecture Notes on General Relativity.)^{2}, the unit 2-sphere:

[tex]g = \begin{pmatrix}1 & 0 \\ 0 & \sin^2(\theta) \end{pmatrix}[/tex]

where [itex]\theta[/itex] is the zenith angle as shown in the diagram above the paragraph quoted.

Earlier in the chapter, he talks about a circle as a manifold. Let's consider the equator of S^{2}, the circle defined in these polar coordinates by [itex]\theta = \pi / 2[/itex]. Is this a submanifold of S^{2}? On the equator, [itex]g[/itex] has constant components:

[tex]g=\begin{pmatrix}1 & 0\\ 0 & \sin^2(\pi / 2) \end{pmatrix}=\begin{pmatrix}

1 & 0\\ 0 & 1 \end{pmatrix}[/tex]

Apparently the equator is flat. At least, every subset of points on the equator is flat, since it can be covered with a set of charts with respect to each of whose coordinate bases the components of [itex]g[/itex] are constant. But there's nothing special about the equator; with a suitable choice of charts, [itex]g[/itex] could be given constant components over any circle on S^{2}. If every point in a Riemannian manifold belongs to a flat submanifold, doesn't this make the whole manifold flat?

Obviously I'm missing something pretty basic here. Is there a fuller way to word "constancy of the metric components is sufficient for a space to be flat" that would make clear how I'm misunderstanding it? Are extra conditions implicit? Do the components have to be constant in one single chart that covers the whole manifold?

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Dismiss Notice

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Constancy of metric tensor components as a test of curvature

Loading...

Similar Threads - Constancy metric tensor | Date |
---|---|

I LIGO and light speed constancy | Jun 2, 2017 |

A Assumptions behind Maxwell's equations for constant speed | Jan 20, 2017 |

I Do the postulates of relativity emerge from Minkowski space? | Apr 17, 2016 |

B Constancy of the Speed of light | Mar 27, 2016 |

Constancy of the speed of sound | Jun 23, 2015 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**