Constant acceleration rate equations

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around deriving the five equations for constant acceleration used in physics problems. A user expresses difficulty in finding these derivations online and seeks assistance. Another participant suggests that a simple Google search for "derivation of equations for constant acceleration" can yield helpful resources quickly. The user acknowledges that their initial search for "derivative" led to irrelevant calculus articles. Clear guidance on the correct terminology can facilitate finding the desired information efficiently.
cam875
Messages
227
Reaction score
0
Im wondering if somebody can show me how to derive the five equations used to solve these types of problems. I've been unsuccesful in finding it on the net and am hoping someone on here can give me some insight. Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A Google search for "derivation of equations for constant acceleration" led me to http://www.ac.wwu.edu/~vawter/PhysicsNet/Topics/Kinematics/ConstantAccEqMotion.html , among others, in less than five minutes.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
thanks I think I typed in derivative which caused me to get a bunch of calculus articles.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...

Similar threads

Back
Top