How is Work Calculated for a Constantly Accelerating Rocket?

Nabeshin
Science Advisor
Messages
2,207
Reaction score
16
If I have a rocket constantly accelerating at some rate a, (requiring some constant force F), I want to know how much work is done by the rocket to travel a given proper length.

For example, a rocket traveling to alpha centauri at 1g acceleration half way and 1g acceleration the other half. It would seem work would just be F*d, however, the d should be as measured in the rocket's frame of reference. Would a correct method of deriving the d to be to take the velocity function of the rocket, integrate from 0 to some t (half way point), and then multiply by two (symmetry) to obtain total distance traveled in the frame of the rocket?

General note: the function I'm using for the time between two points also requires the measurement d. The equation is:
t=\frac{c}{a_0} Cosh^{-1}\left[1 + \frac{a_0 d}{c^2}\right]

with t being as measured on the ship. To get the time to the mid-way point (required for the above approach), is it valid to just set d/2? (and also multiply by two to get the entire shipboard time for the full voyage)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This might be helpful.

http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/Relativity/SR/rocket.html
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thanks for the link, that's actually where I got the posted time equation.

The only possibly applicable equation is that under the section "below the rocket ..." but I don't think that's quite it. That equation gives the remaining distance, or current distance at any time T, whereas I want the total distance traversed in the frame of the rocket... Unless I'm missing some basic calculus I can't get what I need from that equation.
 
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
In this video I can see a person walking around lines of curvature on a sphere with an arrow strapped to his waist. His task is to keep the arrow pointed in the same direction How does he do this ? Does he use a reference point like the stars? (that only move very slowly) If that is how he keeps the arrow pointing in the same direction, is that equivalent to saying that he orients the arrow wrt the 3d space that the sphere is embedded in? So ,although one refers to intrinsic curvature...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...
Back
Top