Constant Field Throughout Entire Solenoid Axis

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on achieving a constant magnetic field throughout the entire volume of a solenoid, which typically experiences a decay in field strength at the ends. One proposed solution involves adding extra layers of wire at the ends, although this increases power requirements. Another idea is to vary the radius of the solenoid, with initial modeling suggesting a convex parabolic contour could maintain uniformity for about 83% of the tube. The user is seeking a more rigorous mathematical approach to derive the optimal shape for the solenoid. The goal is to create a configuration that allows for a perfectly uniform magnetic field inside the solenoid.
RDBaker
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Along the center of a very long solenoid tube the field strength is constant. At the ends of the tube, however, the field decays and drops off.

Is there a simple way (mathematical solution or simple trick) to make the field perfectly constant (or to a fraction of a percent tolerance) throughout the whole volume of the solenoid?

I have two ideas to solve this problem:

[1] Add extra layers of wires at the ends.

This should work but adds more wire, increasing the power requirement. I also haven't modeled this one yet.

[2] Vary the radius of the tube from the central axis.

When I model a solenoid with an convex parabolic contour (a guess) I get some pretty good results for about 83 percent of the tube.
I'm working on a more rigorous mathematical way to derive the optimal solenoid shape. Any thoughts would be much appreciated.
 

Attachments

Last edited:
Engineering news on Phys.org
RDBaker said:
Along the center of a very long solenoid tube the field strength is constant. At the ends of the tube, however, the field decays and drops off.

Is there a simple way (mathematical solution or simple trick) to make the field perfectly constant (or to a fraction of a percent tolerance) throughout the whole volume of the solenoid?

I have two ideas to solve this problem:

[1] Add extra layers of wires at the ends.

This should work but adds more wire, increasing the power requirement. I also haven't modeled this one yet.

[2] Vary the radius of the tube from the central axis.

When I model a solenoid with an convex parabolic contour (a guess) I get some pretty good results for about 83 percent of the tube.
I'm working on a more rigorous mathematical way to derive the optimal solenoid shape. Any thoughts would be much appreciated.

Welcome to the PF.

What is the source of the magnetic field in this problem?

Can you give us some more context to the setup? What are you wanting to achieve?
 
Thanks for the welcome!

A solenoid electromagnet is usually a hollow cylinder wrapped with wire. Someone who wants to make a magnetic field in the middle of that cylinder needs to run current through the wire around it. The magnet strength isn't uniform inside the tube though, because near the very edge the magnet strength (field) begins to weaken. I would like to make a shape that I can wrap wire around so as to make the magnet strength uniform inside the shape. I can add more wires to the end or I can change the shape.

The way I have looked at the problem so far is that I have taken the field generated by one loop of wire (from the Biot-Savart Law), and made a computer program to add many fields together to describe the field strength inside an arrangement of wire. I hope to find a shape (Wire Configuration) which forms a perfectly uniform field inside the volume of the shape.
 
This equation for the on-axis field is exact both inside and outside the solenoid:

http://www.netdenizen.com/emagnettest/solenoids/?solenoid

You can add more layers at the ends.

Bob S
 
Very basic question. Consider a 3-terminal device with terminals say A,B,C. Kirchhoff Current Law (KCL) and Kirchhoff Voltage Law (KVL) establish two relationships between the 3 currents entering the terminals and the 3 terminal's voltage pairs respectively. So we have 2 equations in 6 unknowns. To proceed further we need two more (independent) equations in order to solve the circuit the 3-terminal device is connected to (basically one treats such a device as an unbalanced two-port...
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Back
Top