PowerWorld Sim: Constant Q, Variable P Impact on Load Bus Voltage

  • Thread starter Thread starter scothoward
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Constant Variable
AI Thread Summary
In a PowerWorld simulation, a constant reactive power (Q) load is analyzed as real power (P) increases, affecting load bus voltage. Initially, the voltage decreases with increasing P until it reaches approximately 0.5Q, where the trend flattens and eventually rises. This behavior is attributed to the armature reaction, which distorts the magnetic field and impacts the relationship between internal generated voltage (EA) and terminal voltage (V). The discussion emphasizes that higher P does not always lead to lower voltage due to the complex interplay of armature current, self-inductance, and resistance in the generator's stator. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for accurately predicting load bus voltage in varying power conditions.
scothoward
Messages
28
Reaction score
0
I am currently doing a simulation in PowerWorld where there is simply a generator transmission line and load. The Q (reactive power) of the load is being kept constant and the P (real power) of the load is being increased from 0 to Q.

From this, the load bus voltage is being plotted against the P drawn from the generator. The curve should first be downward (lower bus voltage when increased power is being drawn) and then at some point (~P = 0.5Q) flatten out and then continue upwards (higher bus voltage when increased power is being drawn). I do not understand why this would happen. Wouldn't higher P lead to higher S, which in turn leads to higher current, more losses and lower load bus voltage?

Where is my understanding wrong?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
scothoward said:
Where is my understanding wrong?

It seems for evaluation of generator out put voltage you just considered voltage drop due to generator internal impedance, however you should consider armature reactions too. The voltage EA is the internal generated voltage produced in one phase of a synchronous generator. If the machine is not connected to a load (no armature current flowing), the terminal voltage will be equivalent to the voltage induced at the stator coils. This is due to the fact that there are no current flow in the stator coils hence no losses. When there is a load connected to the generator, there will be differences between EA and V. These differences are due to:

a) Distortion of the air gap magnetic field by the current flowing in the stator called armature reaction.
b) Self inductance of the armature coil
c) Resistance of the armature coils

When the rotor is spun, a voltage EA is induced in the stator windings. If a load is attached to the terminals of the generator, a current flows. But a 3-phase stator current flow will produce a magnetic field of its own. This stator magnetic field will distorts the original rotor magnetic field, changing the resulting phase voltage. This effect is called armature reaction because the armature (stator) current affects the magnetic field, which produced it in the first place. The armature reaction voltage can be modeled as an inductor in series with the internal generated voltage.
If the stator self-inductance is called LA (reactance is XA) while the stator resistance is called RA, then the total difference between EA and V is:

V=EA- jXIA – jXAIA- jRAIA
= EA- jXSIA –RAIA

Where XS = X + XA

For a given phase voltage and armature current, a larger internal voltage EA is needed for lagging loads than for leading loads. Thus, a larger field current is needed to get the same terminal voltage because EA= k.FLUX.ω because ω must be kept constant to keep constant frequency.

Alternatively, for a given field current and magnitude of load current, the terminal voltage is lower for lagging loads and higher for leading loads. Refer to attached page.




--------------------------------
Creative thinking is breezy, Then think about your surrounding things and other thought products. http://electrical-riddles.com
 

Attachments

  • g.GIF
    g.GIF
    11 KB · Views: 509
Last edited:
Hi all I have some confusion about piezoelectrical sensors combination. If i have three acoustic piezoelectrical sensors (with same receive sensitivity in dB ref V/1uPa) placed at specific distance, these sensors receive acoustic signal from a sound source placed at far field distance (Plane Wave) and from broadside. I receive output of these sensors through individual preamplifiers, add them through hardware like summer circuit adder or in software after digitization and in this way got an...
I have recently moved into a new (rather ancient) house and had a few trips of my Residual Current breaker. I dug out my old Socket tester which tell me the three pins are correct. But then the Red warning light tells me my socket(s) fail the loop test. I never had this before but my last house had an overhead supply with no Earth from the company. The tester said "get this checked" and the man said the (high but not ridiculous) earth resistance was acceptable. I stuck a new copper earth...
I am not an electrical engineering student, but a lowly apprentice electrician. I learn both on the job and also take classes for my apprenticeship. I recently wired my first transformer and I understand that the neutral and ground are bonded together in the transformer or in the service. What I don't understand is, if the neutral is a current carrying conductor, which is then bonded to the ground conductor, why does current only flow back to its source and not on the ground path...

Similar threads

Back
Top