Constructing a Dip Coater: Does Elevating Solvent Make a Difference?

AI Thread Summary
Constructing a dip coater involves a novel approach where the solvent is elevated to submerge the stationary substrate instead of dipping the sample directly. This method could minimize the effects of acceleration on the coating process, potentially leading to more uniform coatings. The discussion highlights the differences between traditional dipping techniques and this alternative method. Participants express confidence that elevating the solvent will impact the coating quality positively. Overall, this innovative technique may enhance the performance of dip coating in laboratory applications.
new man
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
We are constructing a dip coater in our laboratory. But because of the disparity between the lowest and highest speed it was suggeted that maybe the initial dipping could be performed by keeping the sample ( ie substrate to be dipped) stationary and elevating the solution until the sample is submerged , and then start the retracting of the sample the normal way ( ie by pullling it up).

Basically the difference between this suggestion and common dipcoaters is that the sample is not actually "dipped" into the solvent, rather the solvent is raised until the sample is covered . Does this make a difference or not ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm sure it does. The coating on the sample wouldn't be subject to acceleration if you raise and lower the solution instead of the sample.
 

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
19
Views
5K
Replies
17
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
22
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
6K
Back
Top