Constructing a Rational Function with Given Asymptotes and Intercepts

AI Thread Summary
To construct a rational function with vertical asymptotes at x=-3 and x=1, a horizontal asymptote at y=0, an x-intercept at -1, and a hole at x=2, the function can be expressed as f(x) = A(x+1)(x-2)/((x+3)(x-1)(x-2)). The vertical asymptotes are represented by the factors (x+3) and (x-1), while the x-intercept is indicated by (x+1). The hole at x=2 is accounted for by including (x-2) in both the numerator and denominator. The constant A must be determined by substituting x=0 to meet the condition f(0)=-2. The horizontal asymptote is confirmed to be zero due to the degree of the denominator being higher than that of the numerator.
TrueStar
Messages
94
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Find an equation of a rational function f that satisfies the given conditions:
vertical asymptotes: x=-3, x=1
horizontal asymptote: y=0
x-intercept: -1; f(0)= -2
hole at x=2

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution



Vertical Asymptotes are (x+3) and (x-1). Also (x-2) because of the hole

(x+1) would go in the numerator because it corresponds with the x-intercept. I'm not sure where f(0)= -2 fits in this. (x+2) goes in the numerator because of the hole.

(x+1)(x-2)/(x+3)(x-1)(x-2)

The answer looks like 6x^2-6x-12/x^3-7x+6 so I'm obviously missing something, but I don't know what.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You're almost there. The graph of the formula you wrote down has all the required asymptotes. If you multiply the whole thing by a constant, that doesn't change. So instead of
f(x) = (x+1)(x-2)/(x+3)(x-1)(x-2)
you might equally well take
f(x) = A (x+1)(x-2)/(x+3)(x-1)(x-2).
Plug in x = 0. What should A be to satisfy the last requirement?

When you are satisfied with your answer, multiply out the brackets in the denominator and the numerator. You'll see that it agrees with the answer given.
 
I cleaned up my original post, sorry about that.

I figured out what piece I was missing. The horizontal asymptote is zero because there is a higher power in the denominator. The constant in the numerator doesn't change this fact...I incorrectly though the 6 would affect both.

Thank you for pointing that out!
 
I picked up this problem from the Schaum's series book titled "College Mathematics" by Ayres/Schmidt. It is a solved problem in the book. But what surprised me was that the solution to this problem was given in one line without any explanation. I could, therefore, not understand how the given one-line solution was reached. The one-line solution in the book says: The equation is ##x \cos{\omega} +y \sin{\omega} - 5 = 0##, ##\omega## being the parameter. From my side, the only thing I could...

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
18
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Back
Top