I Constructing Index: Combining Financial Time Series

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter Tosh5457
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Index
AI Thread Summary
To construct an index from two financial time series with variable weights, it's crucial to define what the index should represent, particularly if the goal is to compare it to another time series. Given the asymmetrical distribution of returns and differing value ranges, normalizing both series is essential for accurate comparison. Using regression analysis can help assess the impact of changes in the combined index on the other time series. Additionally, applying z-scores can standardize the series for better comparability. Statistical techniques, such as those outlined in Lutkepohl's work on multiple time series analysis, may provide further insights into effectively combining the series.
Tosh5457
Messages
130
Reaction score
28
Hello,

I'm facing a problem in a project that I'm not being able to solve. I have two different timeseries, and I want to construct an index that represents the two of them, each of variable weights (so I could choose 50% weight for each, or other combination).

These are financial time series, with these properties:
- The returns on these series aren't normally distributed, they're symmetrical heavy-tailed
- One of the series has both negative and positive values. The other only has positive values

How could I approach this task?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The construction will depend on what you want the index to represent. For instance the S&P 500 Price Index represents the amount to which one dollar, invested at some long-ago base date, would have accumulated if it was always invested in the associated stock portfolio defined by S&P, assuming the portfolio was rebalanced costlessly every day, and that no dividends were received. The S&P 500 Accumulation Index is the same except that it includes dividends in the accumulation.

What do you want your index to represent?
 
andrewkirk said:
The construction will depend on what you want the index to represent. For instance the S&P 500 Price Index represents the amount to which one dollar, invested at some long-ago base date, would have accumulated if it was always invested in the associated stock portfolio defined by S&P, assuming the portfolio was rebalanced costlessly every day, and that no dividends were received. The S&P 500 Accumulation Index is the same except that it includes dividends in the accumulation.

What do you want your index to represent?

I just want to compare this index to another timeseries, to see how changes in it affect the other one. I think that would be the same as the S&P 500 Price Index.

EDIT: In my case, it would also be important to normalize both timeseries, because they are different in nature unlike S&P components
 
Last edited:
Tosh5457 said:
I just want to compare this index to another timeseries, to see how changes in it affect the other one.
In that case the best tool would be to do a regression of that other one against the two time series that you were thinking of combining into an index. That will give you an idea of what impact changes in the two components have on changes in the third.

Constructing an index would confuse rather than clarify the situation.
 
  • Like
Likes FactChecker
You may use z scores with arbitrary origin and scale. Let X & Y be the two series. Calculate z from (x-μx)/σx=( z-c)/d and from (y-μy)/σy=( z-c)/d, for all observed x and y, where c & d are arbitrary. μ,σ are mean and sd etc. The z values are now comparable.
 
As @andrewkirk says, you probably should use statistical techniques to determine how to combine two independent time series to estimate the dependent time series. I have never done work with cross correlations of multiple time series, but Lutkepohl's book New Introduction to Multiple Time Series Analysis may be very applicable.
 
I was reading documentation about the soundness and completeness of logic formal systems. Consider the following $$\vdash_S \phi$$ where ##S## is the proof-system making part the formal system and ##\phi## is a wff (well formed formula) of the formal language. Note the blank on left of the turnstile symbol ##\vdash_S##, as far as I can tell it actually represents the empty set. So what does it mean ? I guess it actually means ##\phi## is a theorem of the formal system, i.e. there is a...

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
3K
Back
Top