Conte Riccati and Jakob Hermann

Poetria
Messages
267
Reaction score
42

Homework Statement



Riccati sets y/x=q and then arrives at x^2*dq. This is his analysis of Jacob Hermann's differential equations criticised by Johannes Bernoulli (published in 1710).

x*dy-y*dx is a constant and is equivalent to dt.

I have understood everything except for the q-substitution.


The Attempt at a Solution



Well, I have tried several times but all my solutions are not correct. E.g. x*dx*(dq-q). I have no idea how he got this square. I am missing some clues.
 

Attachments

  • Riccati, about Hermann (Opere III).png
    Riccati, about Hermann (Opere III).png
    25.5 KB · Views: 505
Physics news on Phys.org
Perhaps you would find a more recent textbook easier to work from. :oldsmile: Ideal is roughly 1900-1970, after that they get more difficult again.

If I have understood right your missing thing is the standard formula for derivative of a quotient, one of the half-dozen practically learned off by heart by most calculus students, see any calculus textbook:

y/x = q

dq = d(y/x) = (x dy - y dx)/x2

His formula Is just given by multiplying dq = (x dy - y dx)/x2 by q2
 
  • Like
Likes Poetria
epenguin said:
Perhaps you would find a more recent textbook easier to work from. :oldsmile: Ideal is roughly 1900-1970, after that they get more difficult again.

If I have understood right your missing thing is the standard formula for derivative of a quotient, one of the half-dozen practically learned off by heart by most calculus students, see any calculus textbook:

y/x = q

dq = d(y/x) = (x dy - y dx)/x2

His formula Is just given by multiplying dq = (x dy - y dx)/x2 by q2

Oh dear. What an idiot I am! Many thanks. :)
 
Oh, I think when you have not done it for a year or two it fades. In fact, I am often not that sure whether to write x dy minus... or y dx minus... and have to stop and think about it.

I was intrigued by your avatar, guessed who she was though I did not remember the name amongst all the Madame de's offhand, and traced her via Voltaire.
I knew of Emilie du Chatelet's important translation of Newton, but I don't think I had known of her as the first to formulate of the law of conservation of energy.
You are doing some interesting studies. :oldsmile:
 
Last edited:
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top