Continue on to elementary real analysis or review calculus?

AI Thread Summary
Reviewing calculus concepts, particularly limits, continuity, sequences, and series, is beneficial before self-studying basic real analysis. While techniques for calculating integrals and derivatives are less critical for this purpose, a solid understanding of foundational calculus is essential. Multivariable calculus is not necessary for elementary real analysis. Engaging with theoretical calculus texts like Spivak's or Apostol's is recommended, as they serve as effective reviews while also introducing key real analysis concepts. Working through these books can provide a comprehensive understanding of both calculus and analysis.
halo31
Messages
51
Reaction score
0
Im kind of rusty on my calculus II and III and I was wondering if I should review it before I try to self teach myself basic real analysis? I have some experience with basic proofs.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's a good idea to review concepts like limits, continuity, sequences, and series. For basic real analysis this will be more important than the various techniques for calculating integrals and derivatives, which make up the bulk of most calculus courses. Also, multivariable calculus is not a prerequisite for elementary real analysis.

Getting your hands on a theoretical calculus book such as Spivak's or Apostol's might be the most productive way to "review" calculus if your goal is to study real analysis. Indeed these books are gentle introductions to real analysis as much as they are calculus books.
 
I also think it might be a good idea to work through a book like Spivak or Apostol at this point. It will be a very thorough review of calculus and it will introduce you to the ideas of analysis.
 
For the following four books, has anyone used them in a course or for self study? Compiler Construction Principles and Practice 1st Edition by Kenneth C Louden Programming Languages Principles and Practices 3rd Edition by Kenneth C Louden, and Kenneth A Lambert Programming Languages 2nd Edition by Allen B Tucker, Robert E Noonan Concepts of Programming Languages 9th Edition by Robert W Sebesta If yes to either, can you share your opinions about your personal experience using them. I...
Hi, I have notice that Ashcroft, Mermin and Wei worked at a revised edition of the original solid state physics book (here). The book, however, seems to be never available. I have also read that the reason is related to some disputes related to copyright. Do you have any further information about it? Did you have the opportunity to get your hands on this revised edition? I am really curious about it, also considering that I am planning to buy the book in the near future... Thanks!
I’ve heard that in some countries (for example, Argentina), the curriculum is structured differently from the typical American program. In the U.S., students usually take a general physics course first, then move on to a textbook like Griffiths, and only encounter Jackson at the graduate level. In contrast, in those countries students go through a general physics course (such as Resnick-Halliday) and then proceed directly to Jackson. If the slower, more gradual approach is considered...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
17
Views
6K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
483
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
4K
Back
Top