MHB Continuity of Complex Functions .... ....

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on understanding the proof of Lemma 2.4 from Bruce P. Palka's "An Introduction to Complex Function Theory," particularly regarding the angle definitions in the complex plane. The confusion arises from the equation $$\theta(z) = -\pi - \alpha(z)$$ for points where both x and y are negative, leading to questions about the resulting angle's quadrant. It is clarified that if y is negative, then $$\alpha(z)$$ is also negative, making $$-\alpha(z)$$ positive and thus placing the angle correctly in the third quadrant. Additionally, continuity issues for $$\theta$$ are noted to occur only at points on the imaginary axis, as it is continuous in the interior of each quadrant but experiences discontinuity on the negative real axis. The discussion emphasizes the importance of these definitions for understanding complex function continuity.
Math Amateur
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,920
Reaction score
48
I am reading Bruce P. Palka's book: An Introduction to Complex Function Theory ...

I am focused on Chapter 2: The Rudiments of Plane Topology ...

I need help with some aspects of the proof of Lemma 2.4 ... Lemma 2.4 and its proof reads as follows:
View attachment 7358
View attachment 7359
My questions are as follows:

Question 1

In the above text from Palka Ch.2 we read in equation (2.7) that $$\theta (z) = - \pi - \alpha (z)$$ ... ... if $$x \lt 0$$ and $$y \lt 0$$ ...

Now $$x \lt 0$$ and $$y \lt 0$$ seems to give us an angle $$\alpha$$ in the third quadrant of the complex plane ... but $$( \ - \pi - \alpha (z) \ )$$ seems to give an angle in the second quadrant as we "wind both $$\pi$$ and $$\alpha$$ in the clockwise direction from the positive $$x$$-axis ... " ... so how do we get an angle in the third quadrant? ... unless it has to do with $$y$$ being negative making $$\alpha$$ negative ... so that $$- \alpha$$ is positive ... ?

Can someone explain how $$\theta (z) = - \pi - \alpha (z)$$ ... ... for $$x \lt 0$$ and $$y \lt 0$$ ...?***EDIT***

I have been reflecting on this question ... and have done an example calculation ... calculating $$\text{ Arg } z$$ for $$z = - \sqrt{3} - i$$ ... see Example calculation in the notes after the post ..

Question 2

In the above text from Palka we read the following:

" ... ... so question marks concerning the continuity of $$\theta$$ in $$D$$ occur only at points of the imaginary axis ... ... "Can someone please explain exactly why question marks concerning the continuity of $$\theta$$ in $$D$$ occur only at points of the imaginary axis ...?
Help will be appreciated ...

Peter===============================================================================

NOTES

NOTE 1

The above post refers to $$\alpha$$ as defined in (2.6) ... ... Equation (2.6) occurs in the remarks/discussion preceding Lemma 2.4 so I am providing the relevant part of this discussion ...View attachment 7360
NOTE 2

See my calculation of $$\text{ Arg } z $$ for $$z = - \sqrt{3} - i $$ ... ... as follows:https://www.physicsforums.com/attachments/7361Note that there is a simple (copying) error in the above ...

Should be

$$-u = \frac{ \pi }{6}$$

$$\therefore u = - \frac{ \pi }{6}$$

Apologies ...
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Peter said:
... so how do we get an angle in the third quadrant? ... unless it has to do with $$y$$ being negative making $$\alpha$$ negative ... so that $$- \alpha$$ is positive ... ?

I have been reflecting on this question ... and have done an example calculation ... calculating $$\text{ Arg } z$$ for $$z = - \sqrt{3} - i$$ ... see Example calculation in the notes after the post ..
You are correct on both counts. The definition of $\text{Arcsin}$ specifies that its domain is $[-1,1]$ and its range is $[-\pi/2,\pi/2]$. If $x$ (in that domain) is negative then so is $\text{Arcsin}\: x$. So the definition of $\alpha(z)$ ensures that if $y$ is negative then so is $\alpha(z)$.

Your calculation for $z = -\sqrt3 - i$ gives the correct result $\text{Arg}\: z = -\frac{5\pi}6$.

Peter said:
Can someone please explain exactly why question marks concerning the continuity of $$\theta$$ in $$D$$ occur only at points of the imaginary axis ...?
It should be clear from the definition that $\theta$ is continuous in the interior of each quadrant, and also on the positive real axis. It is discontinuous on the negative real axis (because it jumps between $-\pi$ and $\pi$ as it crosses the negative real axis). That only leaves the imaginary axis to deal with.
 
Opalg said:
You are correct on both counts. The definition of $\text{Arcsin}$ specifies that its domain is $[-1,1]$ and its range is $[-\pi/2,\pi/2]$. If $x$ (in that domain) is negative then so is $\text{Arcsin}\: x$. So the definition of $\alpha(z)$ ensures that if $y$ is negative then so is $\alpha(z)$.

Your calculation for $z = -\sqrt3 - i$ gives the correct result $\text{Arg}\: z = -\frac{5\pi}6$.It should be clear from the definition that $\theta$ is continuous in the interior of each quadrant, and also on the positive real axis. It is discontinuous on the negative real axis (because it jumps between $-\pi$ and $\pi$ as it crosses the negative real axis). That only leaves the imaginary axis to deal with.
Thanks Opalg ... really appreciate your help...

Peter
 
We all know the definition of n-dimensional topological manifold uses open sets and homeomorphisms onto the image as open set in ##\mathbb R^n##. It should be possible to reformulate the definition of n-dimensional topological manifold using closed sets on the manifold's topology and on ##\mathbb R^n## ? I'm positive for this. Perhaps the definition of smooth manifold would be problematic, though.

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K