mattmns
- 1,121
- 5
Here is the question:
--------
Show the following: Let a>0 be a real number, then f:R->R defined by f(x) = a^x is continuous.
-----------
First we have the following definitions of continuity:
----------
Let X be a subset of R, let f:X->R be a function, and let x_0 be an element of X. Then the following three statements are logically equivalent:
(a) f is continuous at x_0
(b) For every sequence (a_{n})_{n=0}^{\infty} consisting of elements of X with \lim_{n\rightarrow \infty}a_{n} = x_0, we have \lim_{n\rightarrow \infty}f(a_n) = f(x_0)
(c) For every \epsilon > 0 there exists a \delta > 0 such that |f(x) - f(x_0)| < \epsilon for all x in X with |x - x_0| < \delta
---------
I thought the best way to do this would be to use the epsilon-delta definition, since I really could not think of anything with the sequences (contradiction, maybe?).
So now the question is, what do we make delta. Clearly delta must depend on epsilon and on a (and I think on x_0). What I tried was the following, but it does not look pretty:
Let x_0 be some point in R. Our function is increasing, so I said that if we look at x_0 - \delta and x_0 + \delta then we want to show the following: |max(a^{x_0 - \delta},a^{x_0 + \delta}) - a^{x_0}| < \epsilon I then factored out the a^{x_0} and started moving things around to get delta in terms of a,epsilon, and x_0, but it did not really work out, and I am not sure where to go from here.
Any ideas? Thanks!
edit... I think I remember hearing something about showing that it is continuous for some explicit point (like x = 0) and then reducing every other case (meaning every other value x can take on) to the same case of x = 0, thus showing continuity. Would this be sufficient (I think so), and would that be a good way to solve this exercise?
--------
Show the following: Let a>0 be a real number, then f:R->R defined by f(x) = a^x is continuous.
-----------
First we have the following definitions of continuity:
----------
Let X be a subset of R, let f:X->R be a function, and let x_0 be an element of X. Then the following three statements are logically equivalent:
(a) f is continuous at x_0
(b) For every sequence (a_{n})_{n=0}^{\infty} consisting of elements of X with \lim_{n\rightarrow \infty}a_{n} = x_0, we have \lim_{n\rightarrow \infty}f(a_n) = f(x_0)
(c) For every \epsilon > 0 there exists a \delta > 0 such that |f(x) - f(x_0)| < \epsilon for all x in X with |x - x_0| < \delta
---------
I thought the best way to do this would be to use the epsilon-delta definition, since I really could not think of anything with the sequences (contradiction, maybe?).
So now the question is, what do we make delta. Clearly delta must depend on epsilon and on a (and I think on x_0). What I tried was the following, but it does not look pretty:
Let x_0 be some point in R. Our function is increasing, so I said that if we look at x_0 - \delta and x_0 + \delta then we want to show the following: |max(a^{x_0 - \delta},a^{x_0 + \delta}) - a^{x_0}| < \epsilon I then factored out the a^{x_0} and started moving things around to get delta in terms of a,epsilon, and x_0, but it did not really work out, and I am not sure where to go from here.
Any ideas? Thanks!
edit... I think I remember hearing something about showing that it is continuous for some explicit point (like x = 0) and then reducing every other case (meaning every other value x can take on) to the same case of x = 0, thus showing continuity. Would this be sufficient (I think so), and would that be a good way to solve this exercise?
Last edited: