Continuity of exponential functions (epsilon-delta)

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on proving the continuity of the exponential function f(x) = a^x for a > 0 using the epsilon-delta definition. Participants explore the relationship between delta and epsilon, noting that delta must depend on both. One suggested approach is to demonstrate continuity at a specific point, such as x = 0, and then generalize to other points. The conversation also touches on the definition of a^x for irrational x, indicating a need for clarity on this aspect. Overall, the participants are seeking effective strategies to establish the continuity of the function.
mattmns
Messages
1,121
Reaction score
5
Here is the question:
--------
Show the following: Let a>0 be a real number, then f:R->R defined by f(x) = a^x is continuous.
-----------

First we have the following definitions of continuity:
----------
Let X be a subset of R, let f:X->R be a function, and let x_0 be an element of X. Then the following three statements are logically equivalent:

(a) f is continuous at x_0

(b) For every sequence (a_{n})_{n=0}^{\infty} consisting of elements of X with \lim_{n\rightarrow \infty}a_{n} = x_0, we have \lim_{n\rightarrow \infty}f(a_n) = f(x_0)

(c) For every \epsilon > 0 there exists a \delta > 0 such that |f(x) - f(x_0)| < \epsilon for all x in X with |x - x_0| < \delta

---------

I thought the best way to do this would be to use the epsilon-delta definition, since I really could not think of anything with the sequences (contradiction, maybe?).

So now the question is, what do we make delta. Clearly delta must depend on epsilon and on a (and I think on x_0). What I tried was the following, but it does not look pretty:

Let x_0 be some point in R. Our function is increasing, so I said that if we look at x_0 - \delta and x_0 + \delta then we want to show the following: |max(a^{x_0 - \delta},a^{x_0 + \delta}) - a^{x_0}| < \epsilon I then factored out the a^{x_0} and started moving things around to get delta in terms of a,epsilon, and x_0, but it did not really work out, and I am not sure where to go from here.

Any ideas? Thanks!

edit... I think I remember hearing something about showing that it is continuous for some explicit point (like x = 0) and then reducing every other case (meaning every other value x can take on) to the same case of x = 0, thus showing continuity. Would this be sufficient (I think so), and would that be a good way to solve this exercise?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Start by showing a^x is continuous as a function from the rationals to the reals. How is a^x defined when x is irrational?
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K