Continuity of exponential functions (epsilon-delta)

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on proving the continuity of the exponential function f(x) = a^x for a real number a > 0 using the epsilon-delta definition. The participants outline the three equivalent definitions of continuity and explore the relationship between delta and epsilon in the context of the function's behavior around a point x_0. A suggestion is made to demonstrate continuity at a specific point, such as x = 0, and then generalize this result to all real numbers. The conversation emphasizes the importance of establishing continuity through the epsilon-delta framework.

PREREQUISITES
  • Epsilon-delta definition of continuity
  • Properties of exponential functions
  • Understanding of limits and sequences
  • Basic knowledge of real analysis
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the epsilon-delta definition of continuity in depth
  • Explore proofs of continuity for exponential functions
  • Learn about the behavior of exponential functions at specific points
  • Investigate the continuity of functions defined on rational versus irrational inputs
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in mathematics, particularly those studying real analysis, as well as anyone interested in understanding the continuity of exponential functions and the epsilon-delta approach.

mattmns
Messages
1,129
Reaction score
5
Here is the question:
--------
Show the following: Let a>0 be a real number, then f:R->R defined by [itex]f(x) = a^x[/itex] is continuous.
-----------

First we have the following definitions of continuity:
----------
Let X be a subset of R, let f:X->R be a function, and let [itex]x_0[/itex] be an element of X. Then the following three statements are logically equivalent:

(a) f is continuous at [itex]x_0[/itex]

(b) For every sequence [itex](a_{n})_{n=0}^{\infty}[/itex] consisting of elements of X with [itex]\lim_{n\rightarrow \infty}a_{n} = x_0[/itex], we have [itex]\lim_{n\rightarrow \infty}f(a_n) = f(x_0)[/itex]

(c) For every [itex]\epsilon > 0[/itex] there exists a [itex]\delta > 0[/itex] such that [itex]|f(x) - f(x_0)| < \epsilon[/itex] for all x in X with [itex]|x - x_0| < \delta[/itex]

---------

I thought the best way to do this would be to use the epsilon-delta definition, since I really could not think of anything with the sequences (contradiction, maybe?).

So now the question is, what do we make delta. Clearly delta must depend on epsilon and on a (and I think on [itex]x_0[/itex]). What I tried was the following, but it does not look pretty:

Let [itex]x_0[/itex] be some point in R. Our function is increasing, so I said that if we look at [itex]x_0 - \delta[/itex] and [itex]x_0 + \delta[/itex] then we want to show the following: [itex]|max(a^{x_0 - \delta},a^{x_0 + \delta}) - a^{x_0}| < \epsilon[/itex] I then factored out the [itex]a^{x_0}[/itex] and started moving things around to get delta in terms of a,epsilon, and [itex]x_0[/itex], but it did not really work out, and I am not sure where to go from here.

Any ideas? Thanks!

edit... I think I remember hearing something about showing that it is continuous for some explicit point (like x = 0) and then reducing every other case (meaning every other value x can take on) to the same case of x = 0, thus showing continuity. Would this be sufficient (I think so), and would that be a good way to solve this exercise?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Start by showing a^x is continuous as a function from the rationals to the reals. How is a^x defined when x is irrational?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K