Continuity of piecewise function f(x,y)

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on determining the continuity of a piecewise function defined as f(x,y) = 2x when x = y and f(x,y) = 1 when x² + y² = 1. The continuity is verified by ensuring that f(a) is defined, the limit as (x,y) approaches (a,b) exists, and f(a) equals this limit. The limit for the case where x = y simplifies to 2x, confirming continuity at that point. The first problem requires the application of the squeeze theorem and path methods to analyze limits, particularly when dealing with the function sin(sqrt(1 - x² - y²)).

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of piecewise functions and their definitions
  • Knowledge of limits in multivariable calculus
  • Familiarity with the squeeze theorem and L'Hôpital's rule
  • Ability to compute partial derivatives of functions of two variables
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of the squeeze theorem in multivariable limits
  • Learn how to compute limits for piecewise functions
  • Explore polar coordinates for simplifying limits involving circles
  • Review the concept of continuity in multivariable calculus
USEFUL FOR

Students studying multivariable calculus, particularly those focusing on continuity and limits of piecewise functions, as well as educators seeking to clarify these concepts for their students.

jwxie
Messages
278
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Determine all points at which the given function is continuous.

For practice, I want to verify the continuity. Moreover, with piecewise function, I have to verify continuity anyway.

Q1
jl432g.gif


Q2
2dk9tee.gif


Homework Equations



The Attempt at a Solution



Let's do the second problem first.
For Q2, we have x =/= y for the first condition, whereas if x = y, we let f(x,y) = 2x.
So to check continuity, we would have to make sure
(1) f(a) is defined,
(2) limit as x goes to a exists, and
(3) f(a) = limit as x goes to a

The piecewise function proved that f(a) is defined for x = y, then we have 2x (for an arbitrary number, possible).

Then I did limit.
limit as y goes to (x = y), we get x^2 - y^2/ x - y, after simplification, we had (x +y) remained. Substituted y = x, we have x+x, so the limit is 2x.

Indeed, f(x=y) = 2x = limit as y goes to x=y
This problem required no squeeze theorem because simplification and substitution worked.

For the first problem, I attempted a few ways.
We know #1 is true, when x^2+y = 1, we have to have f(x,y) = 1.
So I tried to find its limit and see if it would come out to be 1.

So I took limit of the first function. I can't simplify it, so I am down with squeeze theorem and path methods. But I was confused what limit to take. I tried to eliminate one of the parameter, and did L'hospital rule. This allowed me to take the derivative of sin^1/2(...) which would put its derivative with a -1/2 power. Thus I had

-2y (sqrt(1-x^2-y^2)) / -2y cos(1-x^2-y^2) , and cancel -2y.
But I am stuck. If I did x^2 + y^2 = 1 and solve for x (or y), and plug it in, I would always get -x^2 or -y^2 inside the square root, which is not right...Please tell me whether my approach for Q2 was right, and how to solve for Q1. Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It helps to know that [itex]\lim_{x\to 0}\frac{sin(x)}{x}= 1[/itex]
 
jwxie said:

Homework Statement



Determine all points at which the given function is continuous.

For practice, I want to verify the continuity. Moreover, with piecewise function, I have to verify continuity anyway.

Q1
jl432g.gif


Q2
2dk9tee.gif


Homework Equations



The Attempt at a Solution



Let's do the second problem first.
For Q2, we have x =/= y for the first condition, whereas if x = y, we let f(x,y) = 2x.
So to check continuity, we would have to make sure
(1) f(a) is defined,
(2) limit as x goes to a exists, and
(3) f(a) = limit as x goes to a

The piecewise function proved that f(a) is defined for x = y, then we have 2x (for an arbitrary number, possible).

Then I did limit.
limit as y goes to (x = y), we get x^2 - y^2/ x - y, after simplification, we had (x +y) remained. Substituted y = x, we have x+x, so the limit is 2x.

Indeed, f(x=y) = 2x = limit as y goes to x=y
This problem required no squeeze theorem because simplification and substitution worked.
You have the basic idea, but you're being sloppy in your explanation. For example,
  • f(a) - the function has two variables, not one, so f(a) is meaningless in this problem.
  • limit as y goes to (x = y) - I get what you're trying to say, but you're not saying it very well.
The function z = f(x, y) is defined in a piecewise fashion, with one definition for points along the line x = y, and the other for all other points in the plane. Your limit should start off looking like this:
[tex]\lim_{(x, y) \to (a, b)} f(x, y)[/tex]

The limit can be written more simply for points on the line y = x.
jwxie said:
For the first problem, I attempted a few ways.
We know #1 is true, when x^2+y = 1, we have to have f(x,y) = 1.
Typo here. When x^2 + y^2 = 1, f(x, y) is defined to be equal to 1.
jwxie said:
So I tried to find its limit and see if it would come out to be 1.


So I took limit of the first function. I can't simplify it, so I am down with squeeze theorem and path methods. But I was confused what limit to take. I tried to eliminate one of the parameter, and did L'hospital rule. This allowed me to take the derivative of sin^1/2(...) which would put its derivative with a -1/2 power. Thus I had

-2y (sqrt(1-x^2-y^2)) / -2y cos(1-x^2-y^2) , and cancel -2y.
? The function is sin(sqrt(1 - x^2 - y^2)). Where did the sin go?

Also, you can't just "take the derivative" - this is a function of two variables. You would have to take the partial derivative with respect to either x or y.

Note that your function has two definitions: one for points on the circle x^2 + y^2 + 1, and the other for points inside that circle. That circle can be represented in polar form very simply, and that will help you do what you need to do.
jwxie said:
But I am stuck. If I did x^2 + y^2 = 1 and solve for x (or y), and plug it in, I would always get -x^2 or -y^2 inside the square root, which is not right...


Please tell me whether my approach for Q2 was right, and how to solve for Q1. Thank you.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
2K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K