How Do You Find 'a' for P(-a ≤ X ≤ a) = 0.95?

AI Thread Summary
To find the value of 'a' such that P(-a ≤ X ≤ a) = 0.95 for the random variable X with the given probability density function, the cumulative distribution function (CDF) F(a) must be used. The correct relationship is P(-a < X < a) = F(a) - F(-a), which simplifies to F(a) - (1 - F(a)) = 0.95. This leads to the equation 2F(a) - 1 = 0.95, confirming the approach taken. The next step involves solving for 'a' using the established CDF.
MiamiThrice
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Hi all,

I was having some troubles with a practise question and thought I'd ask here.

Given an r.v. X has a pdf of f(x) = k(1-x2), where -1<x<1, I found k to be 3/4.

And I found the c.d.f F(x) = 3/4 * (x - x3/3 + 2/3)

Now I have to find a value a such that P(-a <= X <= a) = 0.95.

I thought it would be 2F(a) - 1 =0.95 and just calculate a but it didn't work.

Any help?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
MiamiThrice said:
Hi all,

I was having some troubles with a practise question and thought I'd ask here.

Given an r.v. X has a pdf of f(x) = k(1-x2), where -1<x<1, I found k to be 3/4.

And I found the c.d.f F(x) = 3/4 * (x - x3/3 + 2/3)

Now I have to find a value a such that P(-a <= X <= a) = 0.95.

I thought it would be 2F(c) - 1 =0.95 and just calculate c but it didn't work.

Any help?

Hey MiamiThrice and welcome to the forums.

By your post you have figured out your pdf and cdf which is good.

So now you are asked to find a given 'a' for your relation.

Think about the limits of your integration. What is the definition of probability in a continuous distribution? What is the definition for P(X < a) and how can you define P(-a < X < a) in terms of PDF/CDF?

In saying the above, can you now write an integral expression involving 'a', the PDF, and 0.95?
 
I think this is what you mean:

P(x<a) = F(a).

I used that to get F(-a) = 1- F(a).

So for P(-a<x<a) I thought it would be F(a) - (1 - F(a)) = 2F(a) - 1 = 0.95 ?

Was I doing it correct?
 
MiamiThrice said:
I think this is what you mean:

P(x<a) = F(a).

I used that to get F(-a) = 1- F(a).

So for P(-a<x<a) I thought it would be F(a) - (1 - F(a)) = 2F(a) - 1 = 0.95 ?

Was I doing it correct?

Almost correct.

Your first part was correct with P(X < a) = F(a). But P(X < -a) = F(-a). From this we have P(-a < X < a) = P(X < a) - P(X < -a) = F(a) - F(-a) = 0.95. Do you know where to go from here?
 
I was reading documentation about the soundness and completeness of logic formal systems. Consider the following $$\vdash_S \phi$$ where ##S## is the proof-system making part the formal system and ##\phi## is a wff (well formed formula) of the formal language. Note the blank on left of the turnstile symbol ##\vdash_S##, as far as I can tell it actually represents the empty set. So what does it mean ? I guess it actually means ##\phi## is a theorem of the formal system, i.e. there is a...
Back
Top