Continuum Mechanics: Finding Plastic Strain

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating plastic strain in continuum mechanics, specifically addressing the use of average stress (\bar{\sigma}) in the equations for plastic strain. The user questions whether they can assume \bar{\sigma} equals the stress at a specific strain rate and demonstrates calculations for axial and width plastic strains based on that assumption. They also inquire about the appropriateness of using a specific stress-strain relationship and suggest that \bar{\sigma} may relate to Von Mises stress. The conversation highlights the need for clarity on material behavior at higher strain rates and the context of the provided data.
lanew
Messages
12
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



http://img683.imageshack.us/img683/7060/selection001l.png

Homework Equations



\epsilon^{pl} = \epsilon - \epsilon^{el}

\epsilon^{pl} = \epsilon - \frac{\bar{\sigma}}{E}

r = \frac{\epsilon_w}{\epsilon_t}

The Attempt at a Solution



I'm stuck trying to calculate \bar{\sigma}. Can I just assume that \bar{\sigma} = \sigma @ 104 s-1? If so, the axial plastic strain is calculated as follows:

\begin{align}<br /> \epsilon_a^{pl} &amp;= \epsilon_a - \frac{\bar{\sigma}}{E} \\<br /> &amp;= (0.10) - \frac{(66.1)}{(200*10^3)} \\<br /> &amp;= 0.09967<br /> \end{align}

and

\begin{align}<br /> \epsilon_w^{pl} &amp;= \epsilon_w - \frac{\bar{\sigma}}{E} \\<br /> &amp;= (-0.042) - \frac{(66.1)}{(200*10^3)} \\<br /> &amp;= -0.04233<br /> \end{align}

If this is correct I should be able to related the thickness by v, correct?

Also, as far as (b) goes, should I be using \sigma = k \epsilon^n \dot{\epsilon}^m?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
\bar{\sigma} might be intended to be taken as Von Mises (Von Mises is the only context where I've personally seen \bar{\sigma}). So, for this uniaxial stress, you should (if I'm not mistaken) divide the value that you are using for \bar{\sigma} by \sqrt{3}.

I'm not too familiar with this stuff, but I'm assuming that your table of strains and stresses are all beyond yield, and the higher strain rates are supposed to correlate with stronger material behavior (typos in the table?). Figured I'd take a look since you have no replies, but I'm no plasticity expert.
 
Back
Top