Contour Integration: Find Out Non-Removable Singularities?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Manchot
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integration
AI Thread Summary
To determine if a function has exactly one non-removable singularity in a complex plane region, evaluating a closed path integral around the boundary can provide insights. A zero integral indicates no singularities or a singularity with zero residue, while a non-zero integral confirms at least one singularity exists. However, a zero integral does not definitively rule out the presence of singularities, as multiple singularities could balance each other out. The residue theorem clarifies that the sum of residues for meromorphic differentials on compact Riemann surfaces equals zero. Understanding these concepts is essential for analyzing singularities in complex analysis.
Manchot
Messages
470
Reaction score
5
Suppose one was trying to find out whether a function has exactly one non-removable singularity in a given region on the complex plane or not, but for some reason could not find out directly. Does it suffice to take a closed path integral around the boundary of the region, and see if it equals zero? That is, if one determines that the path integral around the region's boundary is zero, does one know for sure that there isn't exactly one singularity? Or, vice versa, if one finds out that the integral isn't zero, does one automatically know that there's at least one singularity? Thanks for the help.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
well look at the residue theorem, which says the integral equalks the sum of the residues of the integrand at all singualrities inside the contour.

hence no singularities implies zero residue, hence non zero integral implies some singularities.

but zero integral does not imply much: you could have one singularity with zero residue, or two singularities with equal and opposite residues, etc...

in fact the residue theorem says that every meromorphic differential on a compact riemann surface has the sum of its residues at all points equal to zero.
 
Ok, thanks for the information. I actually haven't taken a complex analysis course, so under usual circumstances I'd have no idea what you were talking about. Fortunately, I learned about residues just last week by reading Wikipedia and MathWorld in my spare time (a potent combination). I can see why you are a Homework Helper and Science Advisor.
 
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top