Contour Integration for Evaluating Difficult Real Integrals

  • Thread starter Thread starter fred_91
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integral
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The original poster attempts to evaluate a complex integral involving a square root and rational functions. The integral has singularities and is expressed in terms of parameters a, b, c, and d, raising questions about its behavior and potential methods for evaluation.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Some participants discuss the nature of the integrand and its singularities, questioning the feasibility of finding an antiderivative. Others inquire about the possibility of using contour integration for definite integrals and seek hints on how to approach this method.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants exploring the potential of contour integration and the complexities involved. Guidance has been offered regarding the need for knowledge in complex analysis, and there is acknowledgment of the integral's complexity without a clear consensus on a method.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the significance of the limits of integration and the relationship of these limits to the singularities of the integrand. There is an emphasis on the lack of a general procedure for contour integration, which may depend on specific characteristics of the integral.

fred_91
Messages
38
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I want to evaluate the following integral:

[itex]\int \frac{\sqrt{a^2-x^2}(a-x)^{-1/c}(x-d)}{x^2-b^2}dx[/itex]

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



I rewrote it in the following form (to try to make it simpler):

[itex]\int \frac{\sqrt{a+x}(a-x)^{1/2-1/c}(x-d)}{x^2-b^2}dx[/itex]

I have no idea how to start integrating this. I have tried putting it into Mathematica, but Mathematica didn't evaluate it.
Any ideas will be very much appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
We know some things about the integrand;
It has singularities at [itex]\pm b[/itex].
If c is positive, there is a singularity at x=a.
It is complex for x>a.

If this were a definite integral, then I would suggest some kind of contour integration approach. But actually finding an antiderivative for that? Good luck, friend.
 
If this integral was a definite integral, with the integration limits being:
d (for the lower limit), and f (for the upper limit);

would this be able to integrate using contour integration? If so, do you have any hints how I can go through that approach?

Thank you.
 
Possibly. Contour integration methods for computing real integrals are really a bit of an art. There is no general procedure; the way you do it depends on what your real integral is. Also, in your case, it also depends on what your lower limit d, and upper limit f, are with respect to the singularities mentioned.

If you haven't learned any complex analysis (eg. Cauchy-Goursat theorem, Residue Theorem, Cauchy integral formula, etc.), then there really is no way I can guide you to attempt to solve this problem in only a few lines. So I will first recommend you read the following wikipedia article, to get a general sense of how the procedure works.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Methods_of_contour_integration#Applications_of_integral_theorems

Then, if you feel up to it, take out any decent textbook on the subject of Complex Analysis from your library, and it should have a section on the evaluation of Real integrals by contour integration.

I should warn you that I personally have never tried working out an integral as messy as the one you have. In theory, you should be able to do it, I just don't have the time or drive to try. Complex analysis is very useful, and the theoretical results are beautiful, but the applications (like this) are tedious, and at times very difficult.

Good luck.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 105 ·
4
Replies
105
Views
11K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K