Contour integration (related to deformation of path)

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around contour integration, specifically using the principle of deformation of path to evaluate integrals involving exponential decay and trigonometric functions. The original poster presents a problem that requires deducing specific integrals related to the function \( f(z) = z^n e^{-z} \) along various paths in the complex plane.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the application of contour integration and the implications of Cauchy's theorem. The original poster attempts to follow a hint involving three curves but expresses uncertainty about evaluating integrals along these paths. Others suggest considering the behavior of integrals as the contour approaches infinity and question the validity of certain inequalities used in the analysis.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants exploring different interpretations of the problem and attempting to clarify the steps needed to evaluate the integrals. Some guidance has been offered regarding the use of inequalities and the behavior of integrals at infinity, but there is no explicit consensus on the approach or results yet.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the importance of correctly applying inequalities and the need to consider limits as certain parameters approach infinity. There is also mention of potential errors in previous attempts, indicating a careful examination of the mathematical reasoning involved.

equalP
Messages
21
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Use the principle of deformation of path to deduce
\int_0^\infty t^n \textbf{cos}(bt) e^{-at}dt=\frac{n!}{e^{n+1}}\textbf{cos}((n+1)\phi) and \int_0^\infty t^n \textbf{sin}(bt) e^{-at}dt=\frac{n!}{e^{n+1}}\textbf{sin}((n+1)\phi)
where a>0, b>0, c=\sqrt{a^2+b^2}, and \phi=\textbf{tan}^{-1}(\frac{b}{a}) for 0\leq\phi<\frac{\pi}{2}

It also gives the hint to solve this problem.
(a) Consider the integral of f(z)=z^n e^{-z} along three directed smooth curves:
(i)\textbf{Im} z=0, (ii)z=Re^{i\theta}, where 0\leq\theta\leq\phi, (iii)z=ce^{i\phi}t, where t goes from 0 to \infty
(b) Find the bound for modulus of the integral on (ii).
Use the inequality \textbf{cos}\theta\leq1-\frac{2\theta}{\pi} for 0\leq\theta <\frac{\pi}{2}

Homework Equations


Cauchy's Integral Formula and Cauchy's Integral Theorem (I have only learned these two in the topic of Contour integration)

The Attempt at a Solution


I know the question should be solved by comparing real and imaginary part, but I don't know how to evaluate the integrals and hence I follow the hint.
In the previous part, I have shown that \int_0^\infty x^n e^{-x} dx=n!

Hence, I can also solved the (a)(i) of the hint:
\int_{Im z=0} f(z)dz=2\int_0^\infty x^n e^{-x} dx=2n!

But I don't know how to solve (ii) and also (iii) by deformation of path...
(ii)
\int_{z=Re^{i\theta}}z^n e^{-z}dz=\int_0^\phi R^n e^{in\theta-Re^{i\theta}}Rie^{i\theta}d\theta \\=R^{n+1}i\int_0^\phi e^{i(n+1)\theta-Re^{i\theta}}d\theta
Then I do not know what should I do in the next step...
It has the similar case in (iii)

Can anyone help me? Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
How about I ask you this: See that (closed) contour down there? Now suppose I wish to integrate a function over that contour that is analytic inside and on the contour. Since the function is analytic, the integral from 1 to 10 over the red contour should be the same as if I start at the origin, integrate over the blue, then integrate down over the green to the point (10,0) right? Integrating from 0 to 10 is independent of how I get to the end point. So I could write:

\mathop\int\limits_{\text{red}}= \mathop\int\limits_{\text{blue}}+\mathop\int\limits_{\text{green}}

as long as you're careful to keep straight, the path directions of the integrals. However, if I just integrate over all of them in a counterclock-wise direction, then by Cauchy's Theoerm, since the function is analytic,

\mathop\int\limits_{\text{red}}+ \mathop\int\limits_{\text{blue}}+\mathop\int\limits_{\text{green}}=0

Well, that's the three integration paths you have in i, ii, and iii above. Now, I haven't worked it out but I'd start by just plugging in all those integrals into these two formulas and try to just muscle-through all the algebra to see what happens.
 

Attachments

  • mycontour.jpg
    mycontour.jpg
    9.3 KB · Views: 378
I get what you mean.
But the path in ii does not at infinity. Or I can just change the R to infinity by having limit?
 
Last edited:
equalP said:
I get what you mean.
But the path in ii does not at infinity. Or I can just change the R to infinity by having limit?

Yes, we let R go to infinity.
 
I found I typed something wrong (the inequality) and it should be the following:
(a) Consider the integral of f(z)=z^n e^{-z} along three directed smooth curves:
(i)\textbf{Im} z=0, (ii)z=Re^{i\theta}, where 0\leq\theta\leq\phi, (iii)z=ce^{i\phi}t, where t goes from 0 to \infty
(b) Find the bound for modulus of the integral on (ii).
Use the inequality \textbf{cos}\theta\geq1-\frac{2\theta}{\pi} for 0\leq\theta <\frac{\pi}{2}
After plugging in and having \int_{\text{Im}z=0}z^ne^{-z}dz=2n!
I got
\int_{z=Re^{i\theta}}z^n e^{-z}dz=\int_{ce^{i\phi}t}z^n e^{-z}dz-2n! with R\rightarrow \infty
How can I use the inequality to get the bound for modulus of it?
Besides, I found the integral iii is used to deduce the two required integrals and \int_{z=Re^{i\theta}}z^n e^{-z}dz=-n! should be true in order to deduce the two intregrals
But I do not know how to get this result...
 
equalP;4543493 It also gives the hint to solve this problem. (a) Consider the integral of [itex said:
f(z)=z^n e^{-z}[/itex] along three directed smooth curves:
(i)\textbf{Im} z=0, (ii)z=Re^{i\theta}, where 0\leq\theta\leq\phi, (iii)z=ce^{i\phi}t, where t goes from 0 to \infty
(b) Find the bound for modulus of the integral on (ii).
Use the inequality \textbf{cos}\theta\leq1-\frac{2\theta}{\pi} for 0\leq\theta <\frac{\pi}{2}

Ok, let's take it slow. First off, that bounds is a mistake and would lead us in the wrong direction. I mean just plot \cos(t) and 1-2t/\pi in the range from 0 to pi/2. What you get? I'll tell you. Cos(t) is always above that line except at the end points and that's good because we want to know the bounds for the integral:

\int_0^{t} z^n e^{-z}dz

over the circular arc z=Re^{it} for t in the range of 0 to pi/2. So plug in the substitution z->Re^{it} in that expression and compute an upper limit on the value of the integral as a function of R. The first term is easy:

|(Re^{it})^n|\leq R^n

How about the second one? Well,

e^{-z}=e^{-Re^{it}}=e^{-R\cos(t)}(\cos(R\sin(t)+i\sin(R\sin(t))

and therefore:

|e^{-Re^{it}}|\leq |e^{-R\cos(t)}|

Now, we have just shown by plotting the functions that \cos(t)\geq 1-2t/\pi in the interval [0,\pi/2]. Ok, if that is the case, then what can we say about the upper bound on the expression:

|e^{-R\cos(t)}|

in that interval and therefore, what can we say about the upper bound on the integral:

\lim_{R\to\infty}\int_0^t z^n e^{-z} dt,\quad z=Re^{it}, 0\leq t\leq \pi/2
 
I want to ask a few questions.
Why |(Re^{it})^n|\leq R^n, |e^{-Re^{it}}|\leq |e^{-R\cos(t)}| are ≤ but not =?
And I do like this:
|e^{-R\text{cos}\theta}|\leq|e^{-R(1-\frac{2\theta}{\pi})}|
\lim_{R\to\infty}|\int_{z=Re^{i\theta}} z^n e^{-z} dz|,\quad 0\leq \theta \leq \phi\\<br /> =\lim_{R\to\infty}|\int_0^\phi (Re^{i\theta})^n e^{-(Re^{i\theta})} Rie^{i\theta}d\theta|\\<br /> \leq \lim_{R\to\infty}|\int_0^\phi R^n e^{-R(1-\frac{2\theta}{\pi})} Rie^{i\theta}d\theta|\\<br /> =\lim_{R\to\infty}|iR^{n+1}\int_0^\phi e^{-R(1-\frac{2\theta}{\pi})} e^{i\theta}d\theta|\\<br /> \leq \lim_{R\to\infty}|\frac{iR^{n+1}}{e^R} \int_0^\phi e^{\frac{2\theta}{\pi}}d\theta|\\<br /> =\lim_{R\to\infty}|\frac{iR^{n+1}}{e^R}\frac{\pi}{\theta} [e^{\frac{2\theta}{\pi}}]_0^\phi|\\<br /> =\lim_{R\to\infty}|\frac{iR^{n+1}}{e^R}\frac{\pi}{\theta} [e^{\frac{2\theta}{\pi}}]_0^\phi|\\<br /> =0\quad \because \lim_{R\to\infty}\frac{iR^{n+1}}{e^R}=0<br />
Is it right?
 
No. You have:

\int_0^{\phi} e^{-R(1-2t/\pi)}dt,\quad 0&lt;\phi&lt;\pi/2

What's that? Then, if 0&lt;\phi&lt;\pi/2, what's

\lim_{R\to\infty}\left\{\int_0^{\phi} e^{-R(1-2t/\pi)}dt\right\}
 
\int_0^{\phi} e^{-R(1-2t/\pi)}dt,\quad 0&lt;\phi&lt;\pi/2\\<br /> =\frac{\pi}{2}e^{-R} [e^{\frac{2t}{\pi}}]_0^\phi|\\<br /> =\frac{\pi}{2}e^{-R}(e^{\frac{2\phi}{\pi}}-1)\\<br /> \leq\frac{\pi}{2}e^{-R}(e-1)<br />
\lim_{R\to\infty}\left\{\int_0^{\phi} e^{-R(1-2t/\pi)}dt\right\}\\<br /> \leq\lim_{R\to\infty}\left\{\frac{\pi}{2}e^{-R}(e-1)\right\}\\<br /> =0<br />
Is it right?
 
  • #10
That's still not right equalP. What is:

\int e^{-R} e^{(\frac{2R}{\pi})t} dt
 
  • #11
O, I found my mistake...
I forgot the R...

\int_0^{\phi} e^{-R(1-2t/\pi)}dt,\quad 0&lt;\phi&lt;\pi/2\\<br /> =\frac{\pi}{2R}e^{-R} [e^{\frac{2Rt}{\pi}}]_0^\phi\\<br /> =\frac{\pi}{2R}e^{-R}(e^{\frac{2R\phi}{\pi}}-1)\\<br /> \leq\frac{\pi}{2R}e^{-R}(e^R-1)\\<br /> =\frac{\pi}{2R}(1-e^{-R})<br />
\lim_{R\to\infty}\left\{\int_0^{\phi} e^{-R(1-2t/\pi)}dt\right\}\\<br /> \leq\lim_{R\to\infty}\left\{\frac{\pi}{2R}(1-e^{-R})\right\}\\<br /> =0-0=0<br />
Is it right?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
2K