Contractions of indices of the 4-vectors

  • Thread starter Thread starter nikol
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    4-vectors Indices
nikol
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
Hi, can someone confirm those or did I not get the meaning of the 4-vectors indices:

\partial^{\mu}x_{\mu}=4;\partial^{\mu}x^{\mu}=2;\partial^{\mu}x_{\nu}= \delta ^{\mu}_{\nu};\partial^{\mu}x^{\nu}=g^{\mu\nu}
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Those are all numerically correct, however the second one is not a valid tensor equation, because you have two raised \mu indices. Correct tensor equations always have contractions between one upper and one lower index--if you don't do that, the resulting equation is not Lorentz-invariant.
 
Thank you for the clarification
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top