Contradiction between personal dream and the social resposibility.

  • Thread starter Thread starter Twukwuw
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Contradiction
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the conflict between personal ambition in scientific research and the moral responsibility to address global issues such as poverty and suffering. The original poster expresses guilt about pursuing a career in physics, feeling that focusing on the beauty of nature is extravagant in light of widespread human suffering. Responses emphasize that pursuing one's passion, including fundamental research, is not only valid but essential for societal progress. Engaging in science can ultimately lead to practical benefits for society, including advancements that help alleviate poverty. The consensus suggests that personal fulfillment and happiness should not be sacrificed for guilt over global issues, as individual contributions to knowledge can lead to broader societal improvements. The conversation highlights the importance of balancing personal dreams with a sense of responsibility to the world.
Twukwuw
Messages
52
Reaction score
0
Dear my friends,

Everything become so blurred to me, I don't know what I should do for life.

I used to be very ambitious and want to be a good physicist, because the beauty of Nature has been fascinating me for a long time, since the first day I read Einstein Relativiy.

But, as I grow up, I realize more and more.

Everyday, thousands of people are suffering from poverty, famine, war, deaths, and so on.
Can I still be so ambitious and say that: "I want to be a good physicist because I want to study "Nature's beauty"?"

Wrong, I find it is wrong, when people are suffering, I am sitting in office, and "do research?" My dream turns out to be so luxury, and I feel guilty.

Sometimes I told myself that, "hey, you can make use of your physics knowledge and help the other!"
Can I?

I study physics is because I like it, the reason is very simple. I just want to understand everything around me, that is all.
If I make use of my knowledge to do something "practical" in helping people, I find that, this is not what I personally dream of!
I would say, I find that, doing "fundamental" research for understanding Nature is too extravagant, especially when we realize that everyday, thousands of people die in famine.

The problem is:
My personal dream is to do "fundamental" research so that we/I can understand further about Nature.
But, this dream turns out to be so extravagent, as it does not help to those unfortunate people at all!

Finally, I would like to ask all of you, what is LIFE?
If we must die, I mean all the mankinds and even the universe, why we live and why we study further?
Shall we hence stop to do "irrelevant things", and try to make the people around us as happy as they deserve?
Shall we stop our "impratical dream", and try to make the world more beautiful and ideal, rather than always try to achieve our personal dreams?

Please guide me,
Thanks,
Twukwuw.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If everyone spent all their time trying to feed the poor, we would still live in the middle ages. There would be no medicine, automobiles, and mass communication. Also, if there were no scientists, we wouldn't be able to help poor people in third world countries, because it would take years to get one shipment of supplies and food there. We need scientists as much as we need those who actually help to poor hands on. If it wasnt for the scientists, not only would some people be living in exponentially worse conditions, We all would be. And even if you want to do purely theoretical research, someone will make use of it for something practical. Also, you can't just disregard your dream because you feel guilty about not helping the poor of the world. This is ridiculous. As you can see if all scientists and engineers did this, the world would be a much worse place for everyone. Good Luck to you.
 
The only way to end poverty, war, famine... is to put an end to multi-national greed.

I'm putting all my hope in evolution undergoing a catastrophe (mathematically speaking :-p ), see where life settles after that.

In the mean-time do things to help the planet/society we live in - just being nice and treating everyone with respect will help.

Enjoy the life you have but not to the degradation of others.

[/hippy]

o:)
 
Twukwuw said:
Everyday, thousands of people are suffering from poverty, famine, war, deaths, and so on.
Thats not your fault neither your responsibility.

Twukwuw said:
Can I still be so ambitious and say that: "I want to be a good physicist because I want to study "Nature's beauty"?"
Yes you can and you should.

Twukwuw said:
Wrong, I find it is wrong, when people are suffering, I am sitting in office, and "do research?" My dream turns out to be so luxury, and I feel guilty.
Wrong? Why? Can you give any reason?
Don't engage in self-sacrifice. If you do, you'll end up killing your own happiness and your values and you will regret it enormously.

Twukwuw said:
Sometimes I told myself that, "hey, you can make use of your physics knowledge and help the other!"
Can I?
You probably can but if you go into physics solely because you want to help others, then I don't think you'll succeed in it. You succeed in science or any other profession for that matter if you love it and do it because it makes you happy.

Twukwuw said:
Finally, I would like to ask all of you, what is LIFE?
I'm sure others will disagree but for me life is a beautiful adventure with my own happiness as the purpose of my life.
 
Last edited:
Poverty and disease is a problem of the many, caused by the few, to be solved only by the whole. It doesn't serve society well to abandon your dreams in pursuit of a problem you can't fix. Until religion and hardcore politics are a thing of the past, you will contribute more to the greater good by following your dreams and accomplishing them to the best of your abilities.
 
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...

Similar threads

Back
Top