Contradiction regarding capillarity

  • Thread starter Thread starter Himal kharel
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Contradiction
AI Thread Summary
Capillarity involves the behavior of liquids in narrow spaces, which can lead to confusion when comparing mercury in a capillary tube and in a barometer. In a capillary tube, mercury's meniscus is lower than the liquid surface due to its non-wetting properties with glass, while water rises because it wets the glass. In contrast, a barometer measures atmospheric pressure using a closed tube with a vacuum at the top, causing mercury to rise or fall based on external pressure changes. The diameter of barometer tubes is large enough that surface tension effects are negligible, clarifying the apparent contradiction. Understanding these principles highlights the differences in liquid behavior under varying conditions.
Himal kharel
Messages
79
Reaction score
0
I am currently studying surface tension. I came across a topic named "capillarity" where it is said that mercury falls down in capillary tube. But it rises in a barometer . Why is it so?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In barometer?
Hmmm... what 'barometer' means?
Maybe it is forced to enter the pipe by atmospheric pressure?

For classical (Pascal/Torricelli) barometers pipes have usually diameter of 3mm or so. Surface tension is negligible for so wide 'capillares'.
 
This is surely a question of language.

When one end of fine (capilliary) glass tube is dipped into liquid mercury and open to atmosphere at the other the meniscus (surface) of the mercury within the tube is observed to be lower than the general surface of the liquid.

However when the same experiment is performed in water the meniscus is found to be higher than the general surface.

This is because water 'wets' the glass, whereas mercury does not.

This is the origin of "the mercury falls down"

A barometer, however, is not an open ended tube, dipped into mercury or whatever. It is essentially a manometer comparing the pressure in an enclosed bulb with atmospheric pressure. Often the enclosed bulb actually has a vacuum in it so the implementation is a straight tube, closed and evacuated at the top and dipped into mercury at the bottom open end.
As the atmospheric pressure changes it is observed and said that the mercury rises or falls in the tube.

I have tried to make this clearer in the attachment.
 

Attachments

  • baro1.jpg
    baro1.jpg
    11.5 KB · Views: 422
Last edited:
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Back
Top