MHB Contradictory Scalene Obtuse Tn Heights

  • Thread starter Thread starter Kruidnootje
  • Start date Start date
Kruidnootje
Messages
24
Reaction score
0
I plotted 3 points on Google Earth.
West (point A) to slightly North point (point B)= 1284 Km A-B
From Point B to further East Point (point C) = 1717 Km
Then a straight direct line from point C back to point A

The Perimeter = 6001 Km
Area = 57 491 Km

Angle A = 1.711 degrees
Angle B = 177.01 degrees
Angle C = 1.279 degrees
(sorry can't find any degree sign symbol on the right)

Problem:
When I drop a perpendicular line down from Angle B to the longest line (3000) the height is 18 Km
When I calculate by using the formula h = 57491/1500 = 38.33 Km

Is the discrepancy caused by the curvature of the Earth on Google maps? Can one even form an accurate triangular representation in this manner?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
If you were working on a flat plane then you would have a right triangle with legs of length 1284 and 1717 km. The third side, the hypotenuse would have length $\sqrt{(1284)^2+ (1717)^2}= 2144$ km so the perimeter would be $1284+ 1717+ 2144= 5145$ km, not the "6000" km you have.

Since this is already a right triangle, I don't know why you construct another altitude. The area is just (1/2)(1284)(1717)= 1102314 square kilometers.

(And the area is in square kilometers, not kilometers.)
 
View attachment 8035

Hallo countryboy
As you can see from the actual measurements in google Earth I am a little confused as to how this is a right triangle? I see the math you have done but that leaves me a bit bewildered when viewing the actual physical situation.
 

Attachments

  • Screen shot 2018-04-01 at 15.39.34.png
    Screen shot 2018-04-01 at 15.39.34.png
    2 KB · Views: 104
You said, in your original post,
"I plotted 3 points on Google Earth.
West (point A) to slightly North point (point B)= 1284 Km A-B
From Point B to further East Point (point C) = 1717 Km
Then a straight direct line from point C back to point A"

If point B is "slightly north" of point A and point C is "further east" of point C, then angle ABC is a right angle. I don't see how the "map" you show has anything to do with your original description.
 
Country Boy said:
If point B is "slightly north" of point A and point C is "further east" of point C, then angle ABC is a right angle. I don't see how the "map" you show has anything to do with your original description.

Well I suppose it would appear that I should have said, A is west, B is the upper middle point and C is East. Then C back to A is a straight line. I am sorry if the original description was mis-leading you, regardless though, the question still remains now does this make your calculations wrong, or are they correct because you have allowed for something that I missed?
Thankyou countryboy
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top