Control Systems HW: Adjust K for A=2, B=1, C=3, a=3, b=1

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around a homework problem related to control systems, specifically focusing on adjusting the constant K in a transfer function given specific parameter values (A, B, C, a, b). Participants explore how to develop relationships among these parameters, convert the transfer function back to the time domain, and find the damped natural frequency, with an emphasis on achieving critical damping.

Discussion Character

  • Homework-related
  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses confusion about the phrase "develop relationships in terms of the constant parameters," questioning how the constants relate to each other and the role of K.
  • Another participant points out that for critical damping, the denominator of the transfer function must have two equal real roots, suggesting that K can be calculated based on this requirement.
  • A participant seeks clarification on whether the denominator of the transfer function represents the characteristic equation of the output and what solving for its roots achieves.
  • One participant explains that the form of the wave can be expressed as A + Beσtcos(ωdt + φ), indicating that measuring the time interval between peaks can help determine the damped natural frequency.
  • Another participant mentions that the envelope of the wave can be used to determine the value of σ, which is relevant for evaluating K.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying levels of understanding regarding the relationships among the constants and the implications of the transfer function's denominator. There is no consensus on the exact nature of the relationships being asked for or how to approach the problem of adjusting K.

Contextual Notes

Some participants note that the damping ratio is not necessarily critical at the point of discussion, and there are unresolved questions about the mathematical steps required to relate the constants and adjust K accordingly.

Hessami
Messages
9
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I have a transfer function in the laplace domain, and I have been asked to:
"Develop Relationships in terms of the constant parameters and adjust K such that the constants are: A = 2, B = 1, C = 3, a = 3, b = 1"

After finding this relationship, I am asked to convert it back to time domain, find damped natural frequency, and adjust K for critical Damping.

awesomestpicevar.jpg


I drew up this graph in MSpaint, sorry about the terrible quality, but it should hopefully be enough to get the general drift. As far as i can tell it's a graph of the response (laplacian?) against the undamped natural frequency multiplied by time, and it looks like a decaying cosine function. (at least the original does!).

Homework Equations



Transfer function (Laplace Domain) = K/[(s+a)(s+b-A.B)+K.C.B]

The Attempt at a Solution


I derived the Transfer Equation from a block diagram that I was given, and I am confident that I got that part correct.

I'm not sure what this question means by "develop relationships in terms of the constant parameters and adjust K such that the constants are... etc" , because as far as I can tell, the constants are not actually related to each other, and the Value of K has no bearing on what the other constants will be, right?

Following this, the rest should be fairly straightforward:
1) Convert back to time domain using the Laplace transform table,

2) Find my damped natural frequency from measuring periods on the graph.

3)Arranging the equation into
(D^2)/(omega^2) + D(2.E/omega) + 1
where D = differential operator, omega = undamped natural freq, E = damping ratio.
Substituting natural frequency found in 3, and then making E = 1 for critical damping, to find the adjusted K value.TL;DR -
What is being asked in the phrase "Develop Relationships in terms of the constant parameters and adjust K such that the constants are: A = 2, B = 1, C = 3, a = 3, b = 1"?

Should I substitute the constants into the equation, and find the equations for s?

Please help me! I've been stumped on this all week and can only feel myself getting stupider!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
How did you plot this response without knowing the value of K?
For critical damping, the denominator must have two equal real roots. Since all other values are known, you can calculate the value of K such that the denominator has the form [tex](s+s_1)^2[/tex].
For other values of K, you must have other constraints.
 
Thanks for your post CEL :)

Ah, sorry, I wasn't very clear.

The graph that I drew here was given to me as part of the question, but I didn't have access to a scanner when i made that post, so I copied it out by drawing it in paint.

My question was mostly based around the "develop relationships" part. I don't quite understand what kind of relationship they are asking for?

Also, at this point in the question, the damping ratio is not necessarily critical.

Am I right in stating that the denominator of the transfer function represents the characteristic equation of the output?

What does solving for the roots of this equation actually achieve? I'm planning to read up on the Kreyszig book to try and get a better hold on all of this from a more mathematical perspective. Any other suggestions as to how I should go about understanding the concepts?
 
Hessami said:
Thanks for your post CEL :)

Ah, sorry, I wasn't very clear.

The graph that I drew here was given to me as part of the question, but I didn't have access to a scanner when i made that post, so I copied it out by drawing it in paint.

My question was mostly based around the "develop relationships" part. I don't quite understand what kind of relationship they are asking for?

Also, at this point in the question, the damping ratio is not necessarily critical.

Am I right in stating that the denominator of the transfer function represents the characteristic equation of the output?

What does solving for the roots of this equation actually achieve? I'm planning to read up on the Kreyszig book to try and get a better hold on all of this from a more mathematical perspective. Any other suggestions as to how I should go about understanding the concepts?
Your wave is of the form [tex]A+Be^{\sigma t}cos(\omega_d t+\phi)[/tex]
Measuring the time interval between two peaks of your graphic you have the period of your damped natural frequency [tex]\omega_d[/tex].
A is the value when time goes to infinity.
The envelope of your wave is [tex]A+Be^{\sigma t}[/tex]. Measuring the value at two peaks and replacing the value of the time, you can determine [tex]\sigma[/tex].
So you have the roots of your characteristic polynomial and can evaluate K.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K