Conventional current vs current?

  • Thread starter Thread starter jamesfirst
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Current
AI Thread Summary
Current is traditionally understood as the flow of electrons, which are negatively charged particles. However, the concept of conventional current assumes that current flows as if positive charges are moving, even though in most conductors, it is the electrons that actually flow. This convention was established for consistency, as a flow of positive charge in one direction is equivalent to a flow of negative charge in the opposite direction. In circuits, "current" typically refers to conventional current, while the actual movement of electrons is termed electronic current. Thus, while conventional current and actual current can have opposite directions, they can also coincide in cases where positive charges are flowing.
jamesfirst
Messages
25
Reaction score
0
I was always taught that current was the flow of electrons, a direction which negatively charged particles flow

but now we started to talk about conventional current where the positive particles are flowing..

I'm so confused... what specific positive charge is flowing?? and how come people believe that it's the positive charge that is determined to be the current??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
jamesfirst said:
I was always taught that current was the flow of electrons, a direction which negatively charged particles flow

but now we started to talk about conventional current where the positive particles are flowing..

I'm so confused... what specific positive charge is flowing?? and how come people believe that it's the positive charge that is determined to be the current??
In conventional wires, it is always the negative electrons which flow. However, it is possible to have a current composed of positively flowing particles. A problem arises since a flow of positive charge in one direction yields the same current as an equal flow of negative charge in the opposite direction. Therefore, the so called conventional current was introduced. so, by convention we always take the direction of current flow as if it is a flow of positive charges. That does not mean, however, that positive charges are actually flowing.

Does that make sense?
 
So conventional current and current is basically antonyms to one another ?
 
Usually, when talking about circuits, word "current" means conventional current. The word "conventional" is just tacked on so that you wouldn't confuse it with a particle current, which does end up having opposite direction in conductors.
 
jamesfirst said:
So conventional current and current is basically antonyms to one another ?
No, they are not. As I said, it is perfectly possible to have a current composed of positive charges. In which case, the direction of conventional current and 'real' current coincide.
 
So what about when conventional current flows through metals which has delocalised electrons??

Is it still considered to be the positive charge following ?
 
jamesfirst said:
So what about when conventional current flows through metals which has delocalised electrons??

Is it still considered to be the positive charge following ?
In conventional current, yes. The positive charges are consider to be flowing in the opposite direction of the negative charge.
 
rate of flow of electron is known as current.direction of current from high potential to low potential is taken as positive direction for the conviniency . so current in this direction is termed as conventional current and the direction of flow of electron is termed as electronic current.
 
Back
Top