Convergent Infinite Series Proof: Sum of Even and Odd Terms

BrownianMan
Messages
133
Reaction score
0
Prove that \sum_{i=1}^{\infty }x_{i} = \sum_{i=1}^{\infty }(x_{2i} + x_{2i+1}) if \sum_{i=1}^{\infty }x_{i} converges and if for any \varepsilon > 0 there is some m such that |x_{k}| < \varepsilon for all k\geq m.

I'm a little confused by this because for 1/(4^i) for i from 1 to infinity, this doesn't hold. The sum of 1/(4^2i) for i from 1 to infinity is 1/15 and the sum of 1/(4^(2i+1)) for i from 1 to infinity is 1/60. Together they have a sum of 1/12. But the sum of 1/(4^i) for i from 1 to infinity is 1/3. Doesn't this only hold when the index starts at i=0?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There is a small problem with the indices. The sum on the right is missing x1.
 
SammyS said:
There is a small problem with the indices. The sum on the right is missing x1.

Yes! That's exactly what I was thinking. So there must be something wrong with the question, right?
 
It would work if the sums started at i = 0.

It would also work if the index 2i+1 were changed to 2i-1 in the sum on the right side, or if the sum on the left side had i start at 2, etc.

Of course the equality can only hold if both series converge.
 
SammyS said:
It would work if the sums started at i = 0.

It would also work if the index 2i+1 were changed to 2i-1 in the sum on the right side, or if the sum on the left side had i start at 2, etc.

Of course the equality can only hold if both series converge.

True.

I'm not sure if I need to outline the different scenarios for which the equality holds, or just state that the equality as given in the problem is not true. I guess I'll have to ask my prof.

Thanks for the resposnes though.
 
I suspect the both sums should start with i=0, & that's the version your prof. will want you work with.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...

Similar threads

Back
Top