Convergent Subsequences and the Limit of a Series

Doom of Doom
Messages
85
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Consider the sequence \left\{ x_{n} \right\}.

Then x_{n} is convergent and \lim x_{n}=a if and only if, for every non-trivial convergent subsequence, x_{n_{i}}, of x_{n}, \lim x_{n_{i}}=a.

Homework Equations


The definition of the limit of a series:
\lim {x_{n}} = a \Leftrightarrow for every \epsilon > 0, there exists N \in \mathbb{N} such that for every n>N, \left| x_{n} - a \right| < \epsilon.

The Attempt at a Solution



Ok, so I easily see how to show that it \lim {x_{n}} = a, then every convergent subsequence must also converge to a.
But I'm stuck on how to show the other way.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I would say, well isn't a_n a subsequence of itself? But you also said 'non-trivial'. I'm not sure exactly what that means, but can't you split a_n into two 'non-trivial' subsequences, which then converge, but when put together make all of a_n?
 
Yeah, I asked my prof about this one. To him, apparently "non-trivial" just means that the subsequence is not equal to the original sequence. I don't think it actually has any bearing on the problem.

The trick, he said, is that you have to consider every non-trivial (convergent) subsequence.

I'm not sure I know what that means.
 
Ok, then suppose a_n has two convergent subsequences with different limits. Then does a_n have a limit?
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top