Converting 1,602 ×10^−19 C to SI Unit Prefixes

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter at94official
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Si Si unit Unit
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around converting the charge value of 1,602 ×10^−19 C into SI unit prefixes. Participants seek clarification on the conversion process and the appropriate prefix to use.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Technical explanation, Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant requests a simple answer and explanations regarding the conversion of 1,602 ×10^−19 C to SI unit prefixes.
  • Another participant suggests that the value could be expressed as 16.02 atto C or 1 eV, but expresses uncertainty about the term 'SI unit prefixes.'
  • A later reply corrects the initial suggestion, noting that atto corresponds to -18, not -19, and seeks clarification on this aspect of SI units.
  • One participant provides a mathematical breakdown, showing that 1.602 × 10^−19 C can be rewritten as 0.1602 atto C, acknowledging a previous mistake.
  • Another participant confirms the method of multiplying the excess exponent with the coefficient to arrive at the correct conversion.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the interpretation of SI unit prefixes and the correct conversion method, with no consensus reached on the initial query.

Contextual Notes

There is some confusion regarding the definitions and values of SI unit prefixes, particularly the distinction between atto and other prefixes. The discussion also includes unresolved mathematical steps related to the conversion process.

at94official
Messages
50
Reaction score
19
Just simple questions and I need clarifications why is that your answer please.
1,602 ×10^−19 C write to SI Unit Prefixes
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Let me try and see if I understand your query - you say you have a simple question, but that you would require a detailed response, rather than a short answer. Am I right?

I'm not really sure what you mean when say 'SI unit prefixes' - perhaps you want to rewrite ##1.602 \times 10^{-19}\ \text{C}## as ##16.02\ \text{atto C}##, or perhaps as ##1\ \text{eV}## ??
 
failexam said:
Let me try and see if I understand your query - you say you have a simple question, but that you would require a detailed response, rather than a short answer. Am I right?

I'm not really sure what you mean when say 'SI unit prefixes' - perhaps you want to rewrite ##1.602 \times 10^{-19} C## as ##16.02 \text{atto} C##, or perhaps as ##1 eV## ??
Im sorry, I mean I just want a simple answer and requesting for some explanations why.
and to your answer, if we will base it on Unit Prefixes. Atto is -18 not -19 , can you explain this? sorry having trouble understanding this part of SI Units.Prefix Symbol Exponent Prefix Symbol Exponentyotta Y 1024 yocto y 10−24

zetta Z 1021 zepto z 10−21

exa E 1018 atto a 10−18

peta P 1015 femto f 10−15

tera T 1012 pico p 10−12

giga G 109 nano n 10−9

mega M 106 micro μ 10−6

kilo k 103 milli m 10−3

hecto h 102 centi c 10−2

deca da 101 deci d 10−1
 
Well, ##1.602 \times 10^{-19}\ \text{C} = 1.602 \times 10^{-1} \times 10^{-18}\ \text{C} = 1.602 \times 10^{-1}\ \text{atto C} = 0.1602\ \text{atto C}##.

So, I was wrong the first time round! o0)
 
Oh okay, so if that the case you just have to multiply the excess ?
 
Exactly!

Multiply the excess ##10^{-1}## with ##1.602##. :wink:
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: at94official

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
6K