MHB Converting between arcseconds and radians

  • Thread starter Thread starter viawilli
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Radians
AI Thread Summary
To convert 0.05 arcseconds into radians, the formula used is θ'' = θ'' × (1'/60'') × (1°/60') × (π rad/180°), resulting in a conversion factor of π/648000. This calculation yields 0.05 arcseconds as approximately 2.42406841 × 10^-7 radians. Additionally, online tools like Convertin can facilitate quick unit conversions. Understanding the relationship between arcseconds, arcminutes, degrees, and radians is essential for accurate conversions. This method provides a straightforward approach to converting angular measurements.
viawilli
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi i need to convert 0.05 arcseconds into radians and am not sure where to start any help is appreciated. thanks
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
You could use:

$$\theta''=\theta''\cdot\frac{1'}{60''}\cdot\frac{1^{\circ}}{60'}\cdot\frac{\pi\text{ rad}}{180^{\circ}}=\frac{\pi}{648000}\theta\text{ rad}$$

Do you see how I used the fact that there are 60 arc seconds per 1 arc minute, 60 arc minutes per degree and 180 degrees per $\pi$ radians to construct 3 fractions all equal to 1 which I then multiplied with the original angle $\theta$, given in arc seconds, to obtain a conversion factor of $$\frac{\pi}{648000}$$?
 
You convert arcseconds and radians by using the specific formula. Like
0.05 arcseconds=2.42406841 × 10-7 radians.
The above is one method to convert, another method is you can also use convertin, which is used to convert the units online. By this you can quickly perform the conversion problems.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Back
Top