Converting between scientific & regular notation, without changing sig. figs.?

AI Thread Summary
To convert 3.60 x 10^5 to regular notation without changing significant figures, the correct representation is 360,000, which has three significant figures. However, this raises concerns about the significant digits, as 360,000 typically indicates only two significant figures. The discussion highlights that 3.60 x 10^5 implies a value range of 359,500 to 360,500, maintaining three significant figures. To accurately express the uncertainty, it is suggested to indicate it as ± 5,000. The conversation emphasizes the importance of preserving significant figures in scientific notation conversions.
rishay95
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


According to the question, i have to convert 3.60 * 105 to regular notation, without changing the number of significant figures, which is currently, as i understand, three.
I'm just really unsure how to do this.
Any help?

Homework Equations


Some said to write out 360,000 & use a bar on the leftmost zero. But, the textbook doesn't mention bars so I'm not sure if we're allowed to use them. Is there any other solution?

The Attempt at a Solution


If it were 3.6 * 105, I know it would just be 360,000

However, that 3.60 is what's really messing me up.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
360,000 is still correct. 3.6 x 10^5 means that the actual value is in the range from:

355,000 to 365,000.

Whereas 3.60 x 10^5 means that the actual value is in the range from:

359,500 to 360,500.
 
Xisune said:
360,000 is still correct. 3.6 x 10^5 means that the actual value is in the range from:

355,000 to 365,000.

Whereas 3.60 x 10^5 means that the actual value is in the range from:

359,500 to 360,500.

Thanks for the reply, but doesn't the value 360,000 have 2 significant digits? That would be changing the number of significant digits, which according to the question, I am not allowed to do.
 
rishay95 said:
Thanks for the reply, but doesn't the value 360,000 have 2 significant digits? That would be changing the number of significant digits, which according to the question, I am not allowed to do.

To specify 2 sig digs, write the uncertainty after the value.

For 3.6 x 10^5, the uncertainty would be ± 5,000.

That means the uncertainty for 3.60 x 10^5 is...?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top